<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ZeroRank &#8211; More PageRank Carnage (Round 5)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andybeard.eu/1107/zerorank-more-pagerank-carnage-round-5.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andybeard.eu/1107/zerorank-more-pagerank-carnage-round-5.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing, Lead Acquisition, Online Business Strategy and Social Media with Original Opinion and Loads of Attitude</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 04:39:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub" />
		<item>
		<title>By: bolsadetrabajo</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/1107/zerorank-more-pagerank-carnage-round-5.html#comment-441858</link>
		<dc:creator>bolsadetrabajo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 04:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/2007/11/zerorank-more-pagerank-carnage-round-5.html#comment-441858</guid>
		<description>Interesting,&lt;br&gt;Thanks,&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.encuentratujob.com.mx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bolsa de Trabajo&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting,<br />Thanks,<br /><a href="http://www.encuentratujob.com.mx">Bolsa de Trabajo</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PR Going, going, gone: What now? &#124; InvestorBlogger</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/1107/zerorank-more-pagerank-carnage-round-5.html#comment-434723</link>
		<dc:creator>PR Going, going, gone: What now? &#124; InvestorBlogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 04:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/2007/11/zerorank-more-pagerank-carnage-round-5.html#comment-434723</guid>
		<description>[...] more well-known bloggers, too. AndyBeard, John Chow, etc&#8230; The list is getting longer by the minute, too&#8230; There are many [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more well-known bloggers, too. AndyBeard, John Chow, etc&#8230; The list is getting longer by the minute, too&#8230; There are many [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I can&#8217;t drive 55 &#124; Blogging &#124; Candle Monkey</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/1107/zerorank-more-pagerank-carnage-round-5.html#comment-337581</link>
		<dc:creator>I can&#8217;t drive 55 &#124; Blogging &#124; Candle Monkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 04:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/2007/11/zerorank-more-pagerank-carnage-round-5.html#comment-337581</guid>
		<description>[...] with such a new blog, I&#8217;ve been able to watch the google page rank controversy pretty much from the sidelines. I have no dog in this hunt. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] with such a new blog, I&#8217;ve been able to watch the google page rank controversy pretty much from the sidelines. I have no dog in this hunt. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The secret behind Google&#8217;s success &#124; Urbano's Blog</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/1107/zerorank-more-pagerank-carnage-round-5.html#comment-297777</link>
		<dc:creator>The secret behind Google&#8217;s success &#124; Urbano's Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 13:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/2007/11/zerorank-more-pagerank-carnage-round-5.html#comment-297777</guid>
		<description>[...] are thousands of blogs out there whose PR has been taken away by Google (Starryskye, mine, AndyBeard ... ) And this are just examples of people who have told me about [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are thousands of blogs out there whose PR has been taken away by Google (Starryskye, mine, AndyBeard &#8230; ) And this are just examples of people who have told me about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Getting back to blogging&#8230; at Chaos Laboratory: Technology Reviews &#38; Internet Technology News from the Web</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/1107/zerorank-more-pagerank-carnage-round-5.html#comment-297104</link>
		<dc:creator>Getting back to blogging&#8230; at Chaos Laboratory: Technology Reviews &#38; Internet Technology News from the Web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 13:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/2007/11/zerorank-more-pagerank-carnage-round-5.html#comment-297104</guid>
		<description>[...] pagerank, which stood last at 5 as I was involved in paid-blogging - a policy that sent up such an uproar all over the blogosphere. Seems like Google decided to take it all out on the smaller sites (mine [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] pagerank, which stood last at 5 as I was involved in paid-blogging &#8211; a policy that sent up such an uproar all over the blogosphere. Seems like Google decided to take it all out on the smaller sites (mine [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bite Me Google! at What The Jorge?</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/1107/zerorank-more-pagerank-carnage-round-5.html#comment-285489</link>
		<dc:creator>Bite Me Google! at What The Jorge?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 14:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/2007/11/zerorank-more-pagerank-carnage-round-5.html#comment-285489</guid>
		<description>[...] reading a few other blog sites and what they had to say, it must of been true, I have also been de-ranked by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] reading a few other blog sites and what they had to say, it must of been true, I have also been de-ranked by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PureAgeless</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/1107/zerorank-more-pagerank-carnage-round-5.html#comment-284422</link>
		<dc:creator>PureAgeless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 10:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/2007/11/zerorank-more-pagerank-carnage-round-5.html#comment-284422</guid>
		<description>Thank you for this informative article.  I have had my blog for just over a year now.  I review products and services and have not used &quot;nofollow&quot; not because I&#039;m nice, but just because I was not aware of this &quot;game&quot; from the powers that be.  I have given tons and tons of &quot;link love&quot; - I&#039;m feeling like the Mother Teresa of Link Love.  My page rank has never changed from a zero.  I am just starting to learn why.  My site includes a database of doctors who prescribe a certain type of medication and a database of a certain type of pharmacy which is able to make up this medicine (bioidentical hormones).  It is the first site that gives readers this type of information all in one place.  One these pages, I link out to each and every doctor and (compounding) pharmacy.  This is the first site in Canada and the U.S. to do this.  I report the latest health research in the media.  Link out to each and every source story.  All without the nofollow.  I have also commented and contributed to quite a few websites and could not understand why I had so few &quot;backlinks&quot;.  I think my site has value - at least by my ever growing readership I believe it does and the (verbal) comments I have received from doctors and pharmacists.  Well, now I know.  I suppose I have to go and download a &quot;no follow&quot; plugin now.  It&#039;s a shame really in the blogging world when blogging was supposed to be about Web 2.0 and its theory that content would now be generated by both the creator and the reader.  Will a cloud of silence fall upon the blogsphere?  The last few days I have been checking the sites I&#039;ve been commenting on.  Yes, indeed, they have &quot;nofollow&quot; in the code in the View Source.  I&#039;m thinking this is sort of ridiculous.
I can&#039;t understand why Google became the God of the internet.  Why is it illegal to sell links?  Is the blog/website owner not the owner of a business?  Can they not determine how they are to generate income?  
Okay, okay, I&#039;ll go download that &quot;no follow&quot; plugin and try and figure out which links to add nofollow to and which not to.  That&#039;s going to take me hours and hours and hours instead of  doing my research and article writing.
Sorry for the long comment, I&#039;m just a bit peeved.  And if you do follow this posting, thank you so much.  I&#039;ll be back to your site because there&#039;s obviously A Lot for me to learn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this informative article.  I have had my blog for just over a year now.  I review products and services and have not used &#8220;nofollow&#8221; not because I&#8217;m nice, but just because I was not aware of this &#8220;game&#8221; from the powers that be.  I have given tons and tons of &#8220;link love&#8221; &#8211; I&#8217;m feeling like the Mother Teresa of Link Love.  My page rank has never changed from a zero.  I am just starting to learn why.  My site includes a database of doctors who prescribe a certain type of medication and a database of a certain type of pharmacy which is able to make up this medicine (bioidentical hormones).  It is the first site that gives readers this type of information all in one place.  One these pages, I link out to each and every doctor and (compounding) pharmacy.  This is the first site in Canada and the U.S. to do this.  I report the latest health research in the media.  Link out to each and every source story.  All without the nofollow.  I have also commented and contributed to quite a few websites and could not understand why I had so few &#8220;backlinks&#8221;.  I think my site has value &#8211; at least by my ever growing readership I believe it does and the (verbal) comments I have received from doctors and pharmacists.  Well, now I know.  I suppose I have to go and download a &#8220;no follow&#8221; plugin now.  It&#8217;s a shame really in the blogging world when blogging was supposed to be about Web 2.0 and its theory that content would now be generated by both the creator and the reader.  Will a cloud of silence fall upon the blogsphere?  The last few days I have been checking the sites I&#8217;ve been commenting on.  Yes, indeed, they have &#8220;nofollow&#8221; in the code in the View Source.  I&#8217;m thinking this is sort of ridiculous.<br />
I can&#8217;t understand why Google became the God of the internet.  Why is it illegal to sell links?  Is the blog/website owner not the owner of a business?  Can they not determine how they are to generate income?<br />
Okay, okay, I&#8217;ll go download that &#8220;no follow&#8221; plugin and try and figure out which links to add nofollow to and which not to.  That&#8217;s going to take me hours and hours and hours instead of  doing my research and article writing.<br />
Sorry for the long comment, I&#8217;m just a bit peeved.  And if you do follow this posting, thank you so much.  I&#8217;ll be back to your site because there&#8217;s obviously A Lot for me to learn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sitelinks at #60 - A Warning Shot From Google &#124; Smackdown!</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/1107/zerorank-more-pagerank-carnage-round-5.html#comment-271073</link>
		<dc:creator>Sitelinks at #60 - A Warning Shot From Google &#124; Smackdown!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 07:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/2007/11/zerorank-more-pagerank-carnage-round-5.html#comment-271073</guid>
		<description>[...] at least can reasonably assume, based on observation) that with the Google PageRank penalties that ran rampant last year, at first they were simply cosmetic, designed to inhibit people who were selling links based on the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at least can reasonably assume, based on observation) that with the Google PageRank penalties that ran rampant last year, at first they were simply cosmetic, designed to inhibit people who were selling links based on the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: News for all</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/1107/zerorank-more-pagerank-carnage-round-5.html#comment-220609</link>
		<dc:creator>News for all</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/2007/11/zerorank-more-pagerank-carnage-round-5.html#comment-220609</guid>
		<description>Another pagerank update happened a few days ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another pagerank update happened a few days ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Becky</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/1107/zerorank-more-pagerank-carnage-round-5.html#comment-166933</link>
		<dc:creator>Becky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 12:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/2007/11/zerorank-more-pagerank-carnage-round-5.html#comment-166933</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve just had my pagerank reinstated too. I was remove early in December and I requested re-inclusion 2 times and it finally worked. Andy I sent you an email via you contact form, but I guess you get many requests. 

Anyway I am a happy camper !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just had my pagerank reinstated too. I was remove early in December and I requested re-inclusion 2 times and it finally worked. Andy I sent you an email via you contact form, but I guess you get many requests. </p>
<p>Anyway I am a happy camper !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
