Wordpress.com linking structure

In the comments discussing my objections to the current implementation of Google Reader on Robert Scobles blog, something very interesting cropped up.

Robert was vehemently questioning the morals of people in a blogging network.

Hey, you all work for B5 Media, don’t you? You’re gaming Google by linking all your blogs together which puts people who don’t join a network at a disadvantage. But no one calls YOU on that! Maybe THAT is the reason you don’t like linkblogging. It lets the rest of us gain the same traffic advantage that you have by being part of a network. In fact, on your home page you even reprint headlines, but only from those people inside your network. How convenient of you to take advantage of Google that way! I see it now, you just don’t want any competition.

Now that is a pretty big accusation. Robert is by inferrance also suggesting he has no such benefit.

He later went on to also comment about Duncan’s use of Video

So I went snooping around Wordpress.com

All categories on Wordpress.com blogs are connected together in a tag system. Even people who pay the guys at Automattic $250 per month for their VIP host have to be connected to the tagging system.

  • The tag links from each blog page are live links, they do not include “nofollow”
  • The links from the tag pages to other blogs posting on the same subject also do not include the “nofollow” tag

Thus all you have to do is make posts with lots of tags, and get lots of high PR incoming links from a different domain, and depending on how the servers are setup serving content, maybe even multiple different C blocks depending on which server is serving the data for each tag.

Robert didn’t know about this?

Wordpress.com is effectively one massive blogging network, heavily interlinked.

The blogs have very few external links compared to all the internal links on every page. All comments and trackbacks contain “nofollow”

Why do you think Robert Scoble has a PR of 8, the same as a giant like YouTube?

As another example, Techcrunch only has PR7

Honestly I have done things that are naughtier

The big problem is that any new blogger who uses lots of tags is going to gain a massive amount of backlinks from Wordpress.com link pages.

Those links do not relate to the quality of the blog, and depending on the popularity of the keyword, can remain quite high PR for a long time.

I checked Robert’s 27k+ backlinks on Google. The most influential appear first.

The 4th position in the SERPS was a wordpress.com tag for Dell.

Should Robert Scoble have a PR8 and Techcrunch PR7?

Robert does have more backlinks, but how many are them are from within Wordpress.com? I honestly didn’t delve into all the 27K backlinks, and Google wouldn’t show me all of them anyway.

Is this naughty or just smart SEO?

Related posts

This entry was posted in Google, SEO Blog, wordpress and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.

9 Comments

  1. Montoya (3 comments.)
    Posted November 4, 2006 at 2:56 pm | Permalink

    I guess it’s up to Google to stop weighting all those tag links so heavily. I’m sure that if someone reported the situation to Google, they would probably change the way their googlebot treats Wordpress.com.

  2. Bert Colijn
    Posted February 3, 2007 at 4:49 pm | Permalink

    This is a test message.

    Here is my experiment, a little research project.

    I finished the creation of this webpage, it is a completely new idea where I combined advertisements and articles on airlinetickets in one website:
    [Junk Spam Link] airline-tickets-com.info

    If, when and how will Google index it. It has ads, it has duplicate content (from the article directories).

    Please feel free to comment you appreciated thoughts.

  3. Andy Beard (1682 comments.)
    Posted February 3, 2007 at 5:01 pm | Permalink

    Bert Colijn that is the kind of junk spam link that gets you permanently shamed and reported to Sedo. Live links moderated and you are in the sin bin.

  4. Anchor text abuser from London
    Posted June 20, 2007 at 4:59 pm | Permalink

    Call me slow but… i’m not sure i follow the bit about tagging. What tag links are you refering to? And how does someone else’s blog post tagging end up linking to Scoble’s blog?

    Please explain :-)

    • Andy Beard (1682 comments.)
      Posted June 22, 2007 at 12:47 am | Permalink

      One of an SEO’s jobs is to evaluate a client’s site.

      It isn’t hard to evaluate both Robert Scoble’s blog and Wordpress.com and see how clearly they are interconnected with the tagging system and all the followed links.

      As an SEO with enough bad sense to abuse my comment policy on your first visit, you must also have enough skill to spot what Automattic are up to on Wordpress.com – one of the largest link farms on the ‘net.

      At least I interconnect sites which I own and have editorial control over.

  5. London SEO
    Posted June 22, 2007 at 9:28 am | Permalink

    That was a genuine question, which i got the answer to by reading some other posts in your own blog. But thanks for the unduly-defensive retort.

    As for your worries about me trying to spam your blog, that’s the nickname i use on many other blogs that include a “nofollow” attribute, and if you look around the SERPs a bit, you’ll see that it makes as much sense for me to try and spam your comments using anchore text “SEO London” or “London SEO” as it does for Matt Cutts to use the nickname “Google Guy”.

    I can understand the over-protectiveness you’ve obviously engendered for your blog since you’ve dropped the “nofollow” bit, but you could have at least given me the benefit of the doubt!

  6. kevsta (2 comments.)
    Posted April 25, 2008 at 8:44 pm | Permalink

    Interesting stuff Andy, had wondered a few times how some WP blogs end up with seemingly unrealistically large PRs considering their links and content but not yet delved deeper to find out.

    Wordpress are just one big link farm eh? lol.

  7. Andrew Jensen (1 comments.)
    Posted June 12, 2008 at 3:09 pm | Permalink

    Andy,

    Out of curiosity, any changes since you made this post? Has Google limited the link juice power within the WordPress tagging system or has WordPress made No Follow changes? Wonder to what extent they were hit with last fall’s Google attack against blogs?

  8. wwriehriwehitertt
    Posted August 13, 2009 at 11:08 am | Permalink

    (?o?)…

9 Trackbacks

  1. By Wordpress 2.0 & Typo themes - SEO2 » Seo Strategy on November 5, 2006 at 11:35 pm

    [...] Wordpress.com linking structure åŸºé‡‘份额申购价格=基金份额净值×(1+申购费率) 申购份额=申购金额/基金份额申购价格 赎回费=基金份额净值×赎回份额×赎回费率 赎回金额= 基金份额净值×赎回份额-赎回费…>> [...]

  2. By UTW - Tagging SEO Tricks (pt 2) at Andy Beard on November 25, 2006 at 9:19 am

    [...] Technorati is all duplicate content, but it has a purpose, helping people find what they are looking for. I noted recently that tag pages at Wordpress.com which are also full of duplicate content, give great backlinks for the blogs hosted there. [...]

  3. [...] Just a simple example would be Technorati. They provide a useful tool for bloggers with a website full of 100% duplicate content. It is made unique by mixing the duplicate content up and niching it. You can do the same on your own blog by using extensive internal tagging and customising the different archives to look different (I still need to do the second part). Wordpress.com take this a stage further and offer followable links from their tag indexes. [...]

  4. [...] tag index. It is quite likely that index still affects other search results in a big way. Wordpress.com don’t use nofollow for their links to/from the indexes as I have previously [...]

  5. [...] and tagged it "blogging" I would gain link equity from Robert Scoble, via the Wordpress.com tagging system, whether Robert had read my post or [...]

  6. [...] Google should also have had a word with them about their linkfarm – I have also written about their linking structure in the [...]

  7. By JAWW (beta) on October 26, 2007 at 8:35 pm

    Feeling Lucky?…

    just a little fun — are you ‘feeling lucky’ today? then let’s go ahead:
    http://google.com/search?q=wordpress.com+link-farm&btnI=I’m+Feeling+Lucky
    tick-tock, tick-tock, tick-tock…
    ……

  8. [...] a year ago I questioned the use of tagging on WordPress.com to spread link equity around as "a rising [...]

  9. By Quod Licet Iovi? « JAWW (beta) on May 15, 2008 at 9:45 pm

    [...] The only exception to this rule makes Andy Beard, who for the several times questioned Automattic’s spamdexing peculiar linking practice since the very inception of this link farm on WordPress.com. [...]

  • RAP Bank

    I have just signed up for RAP Bank myself - call this a mini-review.
    It seems to be one of the smartest ideas for a long time as a great way to consolidate 100s of affiliate programs under a single entity for promotion.

    It is also one of the best implementations of WordPress I have ever seen.
    It is not without its bugs, as this is effectively pre-launch. For example I just found a bug in the keyword based search RSS feeds (yes RSS feeds for any term will be hot), but it looks like they might be onto a winner.
    Check it out - signup for the basic service is free.

    >Affiliate Program

    P.S. It is not immediately obvious who is running the site, but looking at my Paypal receipt (yes I signed up for Vendor Plus) I believe the site is run by Bill Ortell From Rap-Extras.com who is RAP certified and does the membership add-on that is highly popular.