<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PicApp Isn&#8217;t Free For Bloggers To Use</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andybeard.eu/1298/picapp.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andybeard.eu/1298/picapp.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing, Lead Acquisition, Online Business Strategy and Social Media with Original Opinion and Loads of Attitude</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:54:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Maira</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/1298/picapp.html#comment-441926</link>
		<dc:creator>Maira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 08:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/2008/03/picapp.html#comment-441926</guid>
		<description>PicApp seemed like a great option until I found out they use Javascript. My blog site (&lt;a href=&quot;http://multiply.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;multiply.com&lt;/a&gt;) does not allow it so I can&#039;t use picapp. Anyone care to create a competing site that does NOT use javascript?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PicApp seemed like a great option until I found out they use Javascript. My blog site (<a href="http://multiply.com">multiply.com</a>) does not allow it so I can&#39;t use picapp. Anyone care to create a competing site that does NOT use javascript?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beard</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/1298/picapp.html#comment-286299</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 07:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/2008/03/picapp.html#comment-286299</guid>
		<description>Being in beta doesn&#039;t really solve the major problem hat the technology is currently flawed.
You do now include an alternative image in feeds, but it is so small as to be unusable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being in beta doesn&#8217;t really solve the major problem hat the technology is currently flawed.<br />
You do now include an alternative image in feeds, but it is so small as to be unusable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PicApp</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/1298/picapp.html#comment-286293</link>
		<dc:creator>PicApp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 06:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/2008/03/picapp.html#comment-286293</guid>
		<description>Hi all,
It&#039;s been motivating to read all your comments here. PicApp is paying close attention to all feedbacks, making sure we implement them and improve our platform. 
Our main goal is to provide high-quality images to publishers in a legal, and simple manner. Something we know is missing today. So, keep letting us know what you think and weâ€™ll keep listening!

And hey, we are still in beta, so hang on :-)

The PicApp Team</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi all,<br />
It&#8217;s been motivating to read all your comments here. PicApp is paying close attention to all feedbacks, making sure we implement them and improve our platform.<br />
Our main goal is to provide high-quality images to publishers in a legal, and simple manner. Something we know is missing today. So, keep letting us know what you think and weâ€™ll keep listening!</p>
<p>And hey, we are still in beta, so hang on :-)</p>
<p>The PicApp Team</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/1298/picapp.html#comment-275689</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 03:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/2008/03/picapp.html#comment-275689</guid>
		<description>I Photodropper for my images, and I&#039;m pleased with their plugins for all the major blogging platforms. Photodropper automatically searches Flickr for Creative Commons licensed images. It inserts the pic into your post, and provides the appropriate attribution. It&#039;s pretty seamless, and I don&#039;t have any complaints.

I just signed up for a Picapp account to try it, but now I&#039;m not sure if I want to use until Picapp gets some issues resolved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I Photodropper for my images, and I&#8217;m pleased with their plugins for all the major blogging platforms. Photodropper automatically searches Flickr for Creative Commons licensed images. It inserts the pic into your post, and provides the appropriate attribution. It&#8217;s pretty seamless, and I don&#8217;t have any complaints.</p>
<p>I just signed up for a Picapp account to try it, but now I&#8217;m not sure if I want to use until Picapp gets some issues resolved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/1298/picapp.html#comment-241023</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 11:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/2008/03/picapp.html#comment-241023</guid>
		<description>The picapp service had all my images available for blogging for nothing... no problem apart from the fact that my images were not licenced for that use.
Getty (who the images were held with) allowed the blanket use of all images in their library to picapp, even though they were only supposed to allow access to images they &quot;wholly owned&quot;.
In the meantime, Getty and PicApp were generating revenue from the use of my images through this service, but this revenue does not get passed on to the photographers. What a scam!
I&#039;ll just keep on investing my time and money into new cameras and equipment and giving my work away for free... while Getty rakes in the revenue. Obviously Getty and picapp need the money more than I do!

Seems interesting to note that picapp is owned by PicScout which looks for copyright infringement on the Internet.

It&#039;s also good to see that the picapp logo is &quot;because a pictures worth...&quot; - &quot;...nothing&quot; in my case!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The picapp service had all my images available for blogging for nothing&#8230; no problem apart from the fact that my images were not licenced for that use.<br />
Getty (who the images were held with) allowed the blanket use of all images in their library to picapp, even though they were only supposed to allow access to images they &#8220;wholly owned&#8221;.<br />
In the meantime, Getty and PicApp were generating revenue from the use of my images through this service, but this revenue does not get passed on to the photographers. What a scam!<br />
I&#8217;ll just keep on investing my time and money into new cameras and equipment and giving my work away for free&#8230; while Getty rakes in the revenue. Obviously Getty and picapp need the money more than I do!</p>
<p>Seems interesting to note that picapp is owned by PicScout which looks for copyright infringement on the Internet.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also good to see that the picapp logo is &#8220;because a pictures worth&#8230;&#8221; &#8211; &#8220;&#8230;nothing&#8221; in my case!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy M'Naghten</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/1298/picapp.html#comment-224430</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy M'Naghten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 00:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/2008/03/picapp.html#comment-224430</guid>
		<description>It doesn&#039;t look like there is any prohibition on syndication in the TOS.  You CANNOT &lt;i&gt;transfer the right&lt;/i&gt; to use the image to third parties is basically what it says.  The TOS give you the right to &quot;publish online,&quot; which is a very broad term encompassing static websites and RSS feeds.  So, if you use the images in a blog and have an RSS for that blog, you are not violating the TOS as you are publishing online.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It doesn&#8217;t look like there is any prohibition on syndication in the TOS.  You CANNOT <i>transfer the right</i> to use the image to third parties is basically what it says.  The TOS give you the right to &#8220;publish online,&#8221; which is a very broad term encompassing static websites and RSS feeds.  So, if you use the images in a blog and have an RSS for that blog, you are not violating the TOS as you are publishing online.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#160;&#124;&#160;Social Marketing Strategies from Social Marketing Expert Peter Lenkefi</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/1298/picapp.html#comment-224311</link>
		<dc:creator>&#160;&#124;&#160;Social Marketing Strategies from Social Marketing Expert Peter Lenkefi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 17:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/2008/03/picapp.html#comment-224311</guid>
		<description>[...] that this service is still in Beta and thus, will presumably be improved, there are other who are concerned about the technical wizardry being used to make PicApp [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that this service is still in Beta and thus, will presumably be improved, there are other who are concerned about the technical wizardry being used to make PicApp [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel McGonagle @ http://danielmcgonagle.name</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/1298/picapp.html#comment-223957</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel McGonagle @ http://danielmcgonagle.name</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 17:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/2008/03/picapp.html#comment-223957</guid>
		<description>Oops, sorry about previous comment, it seems that my prior comment never got saved, and I was just testing something out here.

Anyways, the best way to blog with pictures and images on site is to get specific permissions from certain graphics guys and gals to reprint the pictures/images.

You can also get &quot;reprint rights&quot; from those looking for free exposure for their graphics, sort of like those programmers that make WP themes and make them available for free but leave their link at bottom of theme for traffic purposes.

Sure beats having to worry about lawsuits and TOS infirngements.

Thanks,

Dan 

My NO IMAGES BLOG  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, sorry about previous comment, it seems that my prior comment never got saved, and I was just testing something out here.</p>
<p>Anyways, the best way to blog with pictures and images on site is to get specific permissions from certain graphics guys and gals to reprint the pictures/images.</p>
<p>You can also get &#8220;reprint rights&#8221; from those looking for free exposure for their graphics, sort of like those programmers that make WP themes and make them available for free but leave their link at bottom of theme for traffic purposes.</p>
<p>Sure beats having to worry about lawsuits and TOS infirngements.</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Dan </p>
<p>My NO IMAGES BLOG  :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel McGonagle @ http://danielmcgonagle.name</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/1298/picapp.html#comment-223956</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel McGonagle @ http://danielmcgonagle.name</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 17:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/2008/03/picapp.html#comment-223956</guid>
		<description>Oops, sorry about previous comment, it seems that my prior comment never got saved, and I was just testing something out here.

Anyways, the best way to blog with pictures and images on site is to get specific permissions from certain graphics guys and gals to reprint the pictures/images.

You can also get &quot;reprint rights&quot; from those looking for free exposure for their graphics, sort of like those programmers that make WP themes and make them available for free but leave their link at bottom of theme for traffic purposes.

Sure beats having to worry about lawsuits and TOS infirngements.

Thanks,

Dan 

My NO IMAGES BLOG  :)

http://danielmcgonagle.name</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, sorry about previous comment, it seems that my prior comment never got saved, and I was just testing something out here.</p>
<p>Anyways, the best way to blog with pictures and images on site is to get specific permissions from certain graphics guys and gals to reprint the pictures/images.</p>
<p>You can also get &#8220;reprint rights&#8221; from those looking for free exposure for their graphics, sort of like those programmers that make WP themes and make them available for free but leave their link at bottom of theme for traffic purposes.</p>
<p>Sure beats having to worry about lawsuits and TOS infirngements.</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Dan </p>
<p>My NO IMAGES BLOG  :)</p>
<p><a href="http://danielmcgonagle.name">http://danielmcgonagle.name</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel McGonagle @ http://danielmcgonagle.name</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/1298/picapp.html#comment-223955</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel McGonagle @ http://danielmcgonagle.name</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 17:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/2008/03/picapp.html#comment-223955</guid>
		<description>test</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>test</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 28/34 queries in 0.006 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 500/504 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn5.andybeard.name

Served from: andybeard.eu @ 2012-02-13 02:15:58 -->
