<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UTW &#8211; Tagging SEO Tricks (pt 2)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andybeard.eu/140/utw-tagging-seo-tricks-pt-2.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andybeard.eu/140/utw-tagging-seo-tricks-pt-2.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing, Lead Acquisition, Online Business Strategy and Social Media with Original Opinion and Loads of Attitude</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 04:39:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" />
	<atom:link rel="hub" href="http://superfeedr.com/hubbub" />
		<item>
		<title>By: Cezary Lech</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/140/utw-tagging-seo-tricks-pt-2.html#comment-319525</link>
		<dc:creator>Cezary Lech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 21:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/2006/11/utw-tagging-seo-tricks-pt-2.html#comment-319525</guid>
		<description>I was wondering &lt;b&gt;how much traffic&lt;/b&gt; do You get from andybeard.eu/tag sites ? In my case (SprawnyMarketing.pl) it&#039;s less than 2-3% of whole site traffic.

On the other hand:
tags are duplicate content,
users dont use tags, (they don&#039;t click on it)
tags generate tons of news sites,
and it means that less Link Juce and PageRank is provided to sites with content (i mean our articles).


P.S.
&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;I am located in Poland, and my IP address is Polish.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Are You from Poland ? ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was wondering <b>how much traffic</b> do You get from andybeard.eu/tag sites ? In my case (SprawnyMarketing.pl) it&#8217;s less than 2-3% of whole site traffic.</p>
<p>On the other hand:<br />
tags are duplicate content,<br />
users dont use tags, (they don&#8217;t click on it)<br />
tags generate tons of news sites,<br />
and it means that less Link Juce and PageRank is provided to sites with content (i mean our articles).</p>
<p>P.S.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;I am located in Poland, and my IP address is Polish.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Are You from Poland ? ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 78 wichtige SEO/SEM Informationen in englisch &#124; SEO.SEM.SMO.BLOG</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/140/utw-tagging-seo-tricks-pt-2.html#comment-319282</link>
		<dc:creator>78 wichtige SEO/SEM Informationen in englisch &#124; SEO.SEM.SMO.BLOG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 06:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/2006/11/utw-tagging-seo-tricks-pt-2.html#comment-319282</guid>
		<description>[...] Google Likes Tag PagesÂ - Tags bei Google [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google Likes Tag PagesÂ - Tags bei Google [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 78 Essential Search Engine Marketing &#38; SEO Resources! &#124; SEOptimise</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/140/utw-tagging-seo-tricks-pt-2.html#comment-318837</link>
		<dc:creator>78 Essential Search Engine Marketing &#38; SEO Resources! &#124; SEOptimise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 10:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/2006/11/utw-tagging-seo-tricks-pt-2.html#comment-318837</guid>
		<description>[...] SEO Distribution of Clicks on Googleâ€™s SERPs The 950 Penalty or a New Ranking Theory? Google Likes Tag Pages What is a #1 Google Ranking [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] SEO Distribution of Clicks on Googleâ€™s SERPs The 950 Penalty or a New Ranking Theory? Google Likes Tag Pages What is a #1 Google Ranking [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechWeb Media &#124; 52 ways to get quality link.</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/140/utw-tagging-seo-tricks-pt-2.html#comment-164414</link>
		<dc:creator>TechWeb Media &#124; 52 ways to get quality link.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 10:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/2006/11/utw-tagging-seo-tricks-pt-2.html#comment-164414</guid>
		<description>[...] Â There are a lot of networks where you can tag your own and other websites. Many people call them Web 2.0 networks and it is pretty easy to tag your site and get extra link. Read what Andy Beard teach about tagging. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Â There are a lot of networks where you can tag your own and other websites. Many people call them Web 2.0 networks and it is pretty easy to tag your site and get extra link. Read what Andy Beard teach about tagging. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: In Depth: Google BlogSearch &#124; Ranking Blog Documents Patent &#124; Andy Beard - Niche Marketing</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/140/utw-tagging-seo-tricks-pt-2.html#comment-8585</link>
		<dc:creator>In Depth: Google BlogSearch &#124; Ranking Blog Documents Patent &#124; Andy Beard - Niche Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 13:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/2006/11/utw-tagging-seo-tricks-pt-2.html#comment-8585</guid>
		<description>[...] blogsearch, Google have been using it for some time with the main results as well. Here are my observations regarding tagging from back in November, especially how they could relate to LSI [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] blogsearch, Google have been using it for some time with the main results as well. Here are my observations regarding tagging from back in November, especially how they could relate to LSI [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bong</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/140/utw-tagging-seo-tricks-pt-2.html#comment-7818</link>
		<dc:creator>Bong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 21:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/2006/11/utw-tagging-seo-tricks-pt-2.html#comment-7818</guid>
		<description>VERY informative site. Now i understand why people use the no follow tag ! 

Thanks, it was confusing me a little!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VERY informative site. Now i understand why people use the no follow tag ! </p>
<p>Thanks, it was confusing me a little!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Search Engine Marketing</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/140/utw-tagging-seo-tricks-pt-2.html#comment-3448</link>
		<dc:creator>Search Engine Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 05:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/2006/11/utw-tagging-seo-tricks-pt-2.html#comment-3448</guid>
		<description>[removed link - manual spamming doesn&#039;t work here either]
Thank for all the info...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[removed link - manual spamming doesn't work here either]<br />
Thank for all the info&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lateral &#124;Traditional - Blackhat &#124; White Hat SEO - Andy Beard</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/140/utw-tagging-seo-tricks-pt-2.html#comment-3142</link>
		<dc:creator>Lateral &#124;Traditional - Blackhat &#124; White Hat SEO - Andy Beard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 11:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/2006/11/utw-tagging-seo-tricks-pt-2.html#comment-3142</guid>
		<description>[...] Just a simple example would be Technorati. They provide a useful tool for bloggers with a website full of 100% duplicate content. It is made unique by mixing the duplicate content up and niching it. You can do the same on your own blog by using extensive internal tagging and customising the different archives to look different (I still need to do the second part). Wordpress.com take this a stage further and offer followable links from their tag indexes. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Just a simple example would be Technorati. They provide a useful tool for bloggers with a website full of 100% duplicate content. It is made unique by mixing the duplicate content up and niching it. You can do the same on your own blog by using extensive internal tagging and customising the different archives to look different (I still need to do the second part). Wordpress.com take this a stage further and offer followable links from their tag indexes. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Hiccup - Andy Beard</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/140/utw-tagging-seo-tricks-pt-2.html#comment-2876</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Hiccup - Andy Beard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 07:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/2006/11/utw-tagging-seo-tricks-pt-2.html#comment-2876</guid>
		<description>[...] Google Hiccup   Related tags:analytics search engine optimisation seo serps website traffic wordpress wordpress trademarks wordpress trainingFor a few days I have noticed a small hiccup in my SERPs on Google, especially relating to my theories on how Google treat tags. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google Hiccup   Related tags:analytics search engine optimisation seo serps website traffic wordpress wordpress trademarks wordpress trainingFor a few days I have noticed a small hiccup in my SERPs on Google, especially relating to my theories on how Google treat tags. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rose Water</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/140/utw-tagging-seo-tricks-pt-2.html#comment-799</link>
		<dc:creator>Rose Water</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2006 22:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/2006/11/utw-tagging-seo-tricks-pt-2.html#comment-799</guid>
		<description>I think google takes into account whole pages of text, not mere citations, especially when you use the  tag or the [blockquote] tag.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think google takes into account whole pages of text, not mere citations, especially when you use the  tag or the [blockquote] tag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
