<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Google &amp; StopBadware.org Handle Hacked WordPress</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andybeard.eu/2210/google-stopbadware.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andybeard.eu/2210/google-stopbadware.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing, Lead Acquisition, Online Business Strategy and Social Media with Original Opinion and Loads of Attitude</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:54:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beard</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/2210/google-stopbadware.html#comment-443095</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 18:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/?p=2210#comment-443095</guid>
		<description>There are some reasons why I wasn&#039;t using a number of hacking tools, but they are pretty technical and it would take a lot of time.
Ultimately my server has a more conventional (but highly optimized) config now, so some security aspects will be easier to manage (and a lot of it is out of my hands with my server management team)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are some reasons why I wasn&#8217;t using a number of hacking tools, but they are pretty technical and it would take a lot of time.<br />
Ultimately my server has a more conventional (but highly optimized) config now, so some security aspects will be easier to manage (and a lot of it is out of my hands with my server management team)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AntiSpamNews &#8211; News To Save Your Inbox &#187; Blog Archive &#187; See How a Hacked Wordpress is Handled</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/2210/google-stopbadware.html#comment-443094</link>
		<dc:creator>AntiSpamNews &#8211; News To Save Your Inbox &#187; Blog Archive &#187; See How a Hacked Wordpress is Handled</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 18:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/?p=2210#comment-443094</guid>
		<description>[...] Comments [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Comments [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nhile</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/2210/google-stopbadware.html#comment-443093</link>
		<dc:creator>Nhile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/?p=2210#comment-443093</guid>
		<description>Tip: Hacker remover also available in Wordpress tutorial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tip: Hacker remover also available in WordPress tutorial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent2</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/2210/google-stopbadware.html#comment-442923</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 22:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/?p=2210#comment-442923</guid>
		<description>Static sites are harder to hack but, if you have a form of any kind, it&#039;s very doable.  If your static sites are HTML, read up on HTML injection attacks (Wikipedia, Google, etc).  They&#039;re actually surprisingly easy to defend against but can be used to drop a dozen porn links on the bottom of your page; each nicely just out of sight until Google notices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Static sites are harder to hack but, if you have a form of any kind, it&#8217;s very doable.  If your static sites are HTML, read up on HTML injection attacks (Wikipedia, Google, etc).  They&#8217;re actually surprisingly easy to defend against but can be used to drop a dozen porn links on the bottom of your page; each nicely just out of sight until Google notices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent2</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/2210/google-stopbadware.html#comment-442922</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 22:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/?p=2210#comment-442922</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve seen some pretty nasty WP hacks.  Things like WP suddenly attacking other servers or base64, gzipped code used to inject random links into comments.

As long as you stay up to date on WordPress and minimize plugin use, you&#039;re generally fine.  Obviously some of the hacks are going to actually happen before WP.org finds out about them and you might get hit.  They&#039;re usually VERY good at getting back on track though.  If you pay attention when a new version is released (and upgrade) you&#039;re generally safe.

Now that WP has the auto-update option there&#039;s not a lot of excuse.  Some hosting companies even send you an e-mail when a new version is released.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen some pretty nasty WP hacks.  Things like WP suddenly attacking other servers or base64, gzipped code used to inject random links into comments.</p>
<p>As long as you stay up to date on WordPress and minimize plugin use, you&#8217;re generally fine.  Obviously some of the hacks are going to actually happen before WP.org finds out about them and you might get hit.  They&#8217;re usually VERY good at getting back on track though.  If you pay attention when a new version is released (and upgrade) you&#8217;re generally safe.</p>
<p>Now that WP has the auto-update option there&#8217;s not a lot of excuse.  Some hosting companies even send you an e-mail when a new version is released.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beard</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/2210/google-stopbadware.html#comment-442554</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 12:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/?p=2210#comment-442554</guid>
		<description>People can hack static sites, or the shared hosting most people use</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People can hack static sites, or the shared hosting most people use</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AutoSpector Inspections</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/2210/google-stopbadware.html#comment-442543</link>
		<dc:creator>AutoSpector Inspections</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 20:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/?p=2210#comment-442543</guid>
		<description>Seeing this makes me glad I stick with static pages when ever I can get away with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seeing this makes me glad I stick with static pages when ever I can get away with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/2210/google-stopbadware.html#comment-442491</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 11:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/?p=2210#comment-442491</guid>
		<description>We had our site hacked a few weeks ago though we weren&#039;t on wordpress. The hackers uploaded a new index.html file with a &quot;You have been hacked by...&quot; message on it. We were on shared hosting and they had hacked the server and taken everybody down.  Worst thing was it was the best part of 36 hours before our site was back up and running and we lost a hell of a lot of search traffic, no signs that it has cost us search rankings though.

Definately an argument for getting a dedicated server.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We had our site hacked a few weeks ago though we weren&#8217;t on wordpress. The hackers uploaded a new index.html file with a &#8220;You have been hacked by&#8230;&#8221; message on it. We were on shared hosting and they had hacked the server and taken everybody down.  Worst thing was it was the best part of 36 hours before our site was back up and running and we lost a hell of a lot of search traffic, no signs that it has cost us search rankings though.</p>
<p>Definately an argument for getting a dedicated server.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beard</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/2210/google-stopbadware.html#comment-442360</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/?p=2210#comment-442360</guid>
		<description>In theory no, but hopefully Google will provide a way to inform website owners of sites they are linking to which have badware in the webmaster tools soon.

They have the APIs to do it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In theory no, but hopefully Google will provide a way to inform website owners of sites they are linking to which have badware in the webmaster tools soon.</p>
<p>They have the APIs to do it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vlad Zablotskyy</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/2210/google-stopbadware.html#comment-442358</link>
		<dc:creator>Vlad Zablotskyy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/?p=2210#comment-442358</guid>
		<description>Andy,

Just remembered the question I meant to ask when I first saw your post. In your opinion, do you think Google penalizes for liking to &quot;infected&quot; websites even if your links are nofollowed?

It happens often to me on few of my blogs. I get a trackback from a blog, but as I check where the links is coming from I sometimes faced with that dreadful &quot;Warning&quot; message. On some occasions I succeeded to contact the website owners warning then of the problem.

I do let through trackbacks from some automated &quot;quasi-splogs&quot; when the offer a good clean link to my website. The problem with some of them is that their owners don&#039;t always pay attention after initial installation and set up and they get hacked quiet often.

Thought you might have some insight. Thanks in advance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy,</p>
<p>Just remembered the question I meant to ask when I first saw your post. In your opinion, do you think Google penalizes for liking to &#8220;infected&#8221; websites even if your links are nofollowed?</p>
<p>It happens often to me on few of my blogs. I get a trackback from a blog, but as I check where the links is coming from I sometimes faced with that dreadful &#8220;Warning&#8221; message. On some occasions I succeeded to contact the website owners warning then of the problem.</p>
<p>I do let through trackbacks from some automated &#8220;quasi-splogs&#8221; when the offer a good clean link to my website. The problem with some of them is that their owners don&#8217;t always pay attention after initial installation and set up and they get hacked quiet often.</p>
<p>Thought you might have some insight. Thanks in advance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 27/36 queries in 0.009 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 498/509 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn5.andybeard.name

Served from: andybeard.eu @ 2012-02-12 09:10:10 -->
