<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do Google Hate Paid Links, Duplicate Content and Cruft?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andybeard.eu/709/google-duplicate-content.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andybeard.eu/709/google-duplicate-content.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing, Lead Acquisition, Online Business Strategy and Social Media with Original Opinion and Loads of Attitude</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:54:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: firefox indir</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/709/google-duplicate-content.html#comment-235984</link>
		<dc:creator>firefox indir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 14:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/2007/05/google-duplicate-content.html#comment-235984</guid>
		<description>nice blog ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice blog ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Igor The Troll</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/709/google-duplicate-content.html#comment-64588</link>
		<dc:creator>Igor The Troll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 04:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/2007/05/google-duplicate-content.html#comment-64588</guid>
		<description>Googdluck listiing to anything useful that similing MiniMe says to you..

He just hangs spaghetti on your years and calls it tough love...

Evil paid links, evil link exchange, PR pixels on the way out...

What is next to come? Will we need to be certified by Google to reregester our domain in the future?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Googdluck listiing to anything useful that similing MiniMe says to you..</p>
<p>He just hangs spaghetti on your years and calls it tough love&#8230;</p>
<p>Evil paid links, evil link exchange, PR pixels on the way out&#8230;</p>
<p>What is next to come? Will we need to be certified by Google to reregester our domain in the future?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internet Marketing Tips From The Web 5/11/2007</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/709/google-duplicate-content.html#comment-22218</link>
		<dc:creator>Internet Marketing Tips From The Web 5/11/2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 15:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/2007/05/google-duplicate-content.html#comment-22218</guid>
		<description>[...] Paid Link Blog Meme Excellent counter to Google&#8217;s position on paid links. Found via Andy Beard. The truth of the matter is that the Search Engines have to come up with a revolutionary way to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Paid Link Blog Meme Excellent counter to Google&#8217;s position on paid links. Found via Andy Beard. The truth of the matter is that the Search Engines have to come up with a revolutionary way to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robwatts</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/709/google-duplicate-content.html#comment-18942</link>
		<dc:creator>robwatts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 12:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/2007/05/google-duplicate-content.html#comment-18942</guid>
		<description>Hah! granted, and fair comment... but they (well Matt at least) weren&#039;t always as obfuscacious as today - at least not in the earlier GoogleGuy WMW world days, believe it or not you could then actually see through some of that smoke and gain a little insight, well at least thats what my perception told me. :D 

I&#039;m reminded of psychometry. There is one test that is pretty standard, which most people fail/pass with flying colours. It asks all manner of questions that are seemingly random yet designed to test a certain aspect of personality. Once the test is complete it is revealed that it is a test for honesty or at least an ability to be frank and candid with questions that relate to everyday events and interactions. One such question is about being on a public train and seeing a surly looking young 20 year old smoking a cigarette. Most people tick the &#039;I&#039;d ask him to put it out box&#039; the reality is in life very few people would.

What does this have to do with Spin and PR? Not a great deal I guess,  was trying to illustrate that by digging a little deeper and seeing a person in their broader context, weighing up what they say to one thing against another, then you do eventually get a feel.If Obfuscation attempt == &#039;x&#039; then whatever is left might be an alternative answer/solution. Matt&#039;s been pretty consistant year in year out, but has slipped occassionaly, without even realising I reckon. Specifics? nah - can&#039;t recall, pure opinion, recollection gut feeling.

Just to be clear here, obfuscation and lies are of course two different things, wouldn&#039;t want to suggest that they are a pair of lying so and so&#039;s.

It&#039;s just &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/google-hell/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;PR and spin management&lt;/a&gt; these days, which is a little sad for us, yet to be expected too, take that supp thing, how could they possibly say anything else, lawyers would have a field day. 

Anyone who expects anything else is straw clutching and expecting a golden goose to give up its golden eggs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hah! granted, and fair comment&#8230; but they (well Matt at least) weren&#8217;t always as obfuscacious as today &#8211; at least not in the earlier GoogleGuy WMW world days, believe it or not you could then actually see through some of that smoke and gain a little insight, well at least thats what my perception told me. :D </p>
<p>I&#8217;m reminded of psychometry. There is one test that is pretty standard, which most people fail/pass with flying colours. It asks all manner of questions that are seemingly random yet designed to test a certain aspect of personality. Once the test is complete it is revealed that it is a test for honesty or at least an ability to be frank and candid with questions that relate to everyday events and interactions. One such question is about being on a public train and seeing a surly looking young 20 year old smoking a cigarette. Most people tick the &#8216;I&#8217;d ask him to put it out box&#8217; the reality is in life very few people would.</p>
<p>What does this have to do with Spin and PR? Not a great deal I guess,  was trying to illustrate that by digging a little deeper and seeing a person in their broader context, weighing up what they say to one thing against another, then you do eventually get a feel.If Obfuscation attempt == &#8216;x&#8217; then whatever is left might be an alternative answer/solution. Matt&#8217;s been pretty consistant year in year out, but has slipped occassionaly, without even realising I reckon. Specifics? nah &#8211; can&#8217;t recall, pure opinion, recollection gut feeling.</p>
<p>Just to be clear here, obfuscation and lies are of course two different things, wouldn&#8217;t want to suggest that they are a pair of lying so and so&#8217;s.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s just <a href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/google-hell/">PR and spin management</a> these days, which is a little sad for us, yet to be expected too, take that supp thing, how could they possibly say anything else, lawyers would have a field day. </p>
<p>Anyone who expects anything else is straw clutching and expecting a golden goose to give up its golden eggs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beard</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/709/google-duplicate-content.html#comment-18937</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 12:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/2007/05/google-duplicate-content.html#comment-18937</guid>
		<description>How do you read between the lines when they are a scrawled mess with no real coherent horizon.. as in none of them are vertical or horizontal?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you read between the lines when they are a scrawled mess with no real coherent horizon.. as in none of them are vertical or horizontal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robwatts</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/709/google-duplicate-content.html#comment-18935</link>
		<dc:creator>robwatts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 12:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/2007/05/google-duplicate-content.html#comment-18935</guid>
		<description>I realised some time back that its quite useful to read the likes of Adam and his guvnor Matt, in a ready betweeny the linesy kinda way. Look for what they don&#039;t say, look at what they choose to ignore and the way in which they ignore it, it really can be quite enlightening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I realised some time back that its quite useful to read the likes of Adam and his guvnor Matt, in a ready betweeny the linesy kinda way. Look for what they don&#8217;t say, look at what they choose to ignore and the way in which they ignore it, it really can be quite enlightening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 29/34 queries in 0.006 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 456/460 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn5.andybeard.name

Served from: andybeard.eu @ 2012-02-13 08:51:49 -->
