<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogging Full Disclosure Debacle &#8211; Grow Some Brass Ones</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andybeard.eu/824/blogging-full-disclosure.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andybeard.eu/824/blogging-full-disclosure.html</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing, Lead Acquisition, Online Business Strategy and Social Media with Original Opinion and Loads of Attitude</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:54:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Inside the Mind of an Internet Marketer</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/824/blogging-full-disclosure.html#comment-57048</link>
		<dc:creator>Inside the Mind of an Internet Marketer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 14:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/2007/06/blogging-full-disclosure.html#comment-57048</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;FREE Link - Promote Your Site &amp; Spam Me - Please...&lt;/strong&gt;

I assume that if you are reading this, you were drawn in by the title of this post.&#160; Is it a hoax? Will I really give you a FREE link to your website?&#160; Do I really want you to spam......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>FREE Link &#8211; Promote Your Site &#38; Spam Me &#8211; Please&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I assume that if you are reading this, you were drawn in by the title of this post.&nbsp; Is it a hoax? Will I really give you a FREE link to your website?&nbsp; Do I really want you to spam&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/824/blogging-full-disclosure.html#comment-48708</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 21:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/2007/06/blogging-full-disclosure.html#comment-48708</guid>
		<description>I realize I&#039;m late to the party on this, but this interview just finally made it to iTunes a couple days ago. I like and respect both Shoemoney and Rand Fishkin very much (not personally...don&#039;t know them...probably never will). But in different ways and in different reasons. 

Jeremy is very much a street-level guy. He speaks very plainly, he&#039;s out there hustling for every dime he can pick up. He&#039;s got a high profile... but unlike John Chow, who seeks it out... Shoe just seems to draw attention because he&#039;s pretty flamboyant in his bluntness. He doesn&#039;t want anyone looking up to him. He investigates everything himself. I think that&#039;s just fine...and so is his &quot;blanket disclosure&quot;. There&#039;s plenty of room in the world for scrappy guys like this... always challenging the status quo.

Rand is a completely different animal. His knowledge is solid, he&#039;s very well-spoken and chooses those words carefully. I love his stuff. Very informative. But his reputation is everything to him. You can&#039;t behave like a hustler and get people to throw 10K of their hard-earned money your way every month. And I believe his approach is the right one...in his case. He needs for people to know that his objectivity is not for sale. Otherwise, his business is gone.

Shoemoney couldn&#039;t give a rat&#039;s ass about his rep for the most part. Take away what he&#039;s accomplished so far...and he&#039;ll just get up and start from scratch tomorrow.

Of the two, I found myself identifying more closely with Rand. But, whether focused and on point and well-researched or not...I still enjoyed the discussion. The only downside was that they were clearly having a difficult time hearing each other on the phone. That made for some awkwards gaps, and some lapses in communication.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I realize I&#8217;m late to the party on this, but this interview just finally made it to iTunes a couple days ago. I like and respect both Shoemoney and Rand Fishkin very much (not personally&#8230;don&#8217;t know them&#8230;probably never will). But in different ways and in different reasons. </p>
<p>Jeremy is very much a street-level guy. He speaks very plainly, he&#8217;s out there hustling for every dime he can pick up. He&#8217;s got a high profile&#8230; but unlike John Chow, who seeks it out&#8230; Shoe just seems to draw attention because he&#8217;s pretty flamboyant in his bluntness. He doesn&#8217;t want anyone looking up to him. He investigates everything himself. I think that&#8217;s just fine&#8230;and so is his &#8220;blanket disclosure&#8221;. There&#8217;s plenty of room in the world for scrappy guys like this&#8230; always challenging the status quo.</p>
<p>Rand is a completely different animal. His knowledge is solid, he&#8217;s very well-spoken and chooses those words carefully. I love his stuff. Very informative. But his reputation is everything to him. You can&#8217;t behave like a hustler and get people to throw 10K of their hard-earned money your way every month. And I believe his approach is the right one&#8230;in his case. He needs for people to know that his objectivity is not for sale. Otherwise, his business is gone.</p>
<p>Shoemoney couldn&#8217;t give a rat&#8217;s ass about his rep for the most part. Take away what he&#8217;s accomplished so far&#8230;and he&#8217;ll just get up and start from scratch tomorrow.</p>
<p>Of the two, I found myself identifying more closely with Rand. But, whether focused and on point and well-researched or not&#8230;I still enjoyed the discussion. The only downside was that they were clearly having a difficult time hearing each other on the phone. That made for some awkwards gaps, and some lapses in communication.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I Would Like To Disclose My Disclosure &#124; Quentin Brown</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/824/blogging-full-disclosure.html#comment-40439</link>
		<dc:creator>I Would Like To Disclose My Disclosure &#124; Quentin Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 17:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/2007/06/blogging-full-disclosure.html#comment-40439</guid>
		<description>[...] Andy Beard recently chimed in on the discussion and had some great stuff to say about this blog disclosure issue. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Andy Beard recently chimed in on the discussion and had some great stuff to say about this blog disclosure issue. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fitness guy</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/824/blogging-full-disclosure.html#comment-38379</link>
		<dc:creator>Fitness guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/2007/06/blogging-full-disclosure.html#comment-38379</guid>
		<description>In response to Shazad&#039;s comment: Isn&#039;t this exactly the reason a blanket disclosure statement is necessary?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to Shazad&#8217;s comment: Isn&#8217;t this exactly the reason a blanket disclosure statement is necessary?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Hartzer</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/824/blogging-full-disclosure.html#comment-34633</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Hartzer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/2007/06/blogging-full-disclosure.html#comment-34633</guid>
		<description>I understand the logic here. But, affiliates &lt;b&gt;chooose&lt;/b&gt; to do business or not do business with companies like Clickbank. And it&#039;s my opinion that companies like Clickbank can make up any rules they want to. Since the affiliate is not a consumer then they don&#039;t have to do business with Clickbank--and vice versa. Clickbank deserves the right to pay or &#039;not pay&#039; companies or individuals who send them traffic.

A company can decide that their affiliates must have a certain type of link on their site in order to get paid. They can decide whether or not the affiliate must disclose that they&#039;re an affiliate. Of course the affiliate shouldn&#039;t misrepresent themselves, though.

When it comes to disclosure, I don&#039;t personally think the USA&#039;s FTC can get involved--this is a business transaction that doesn&#039;t necessarily directly involves the consumer. It&#039;s a referral...and the consumer clicks on a link and goes on over to &lt;b&gt;another site&lt;/b&gt; where such things should be disclosed (like guarantees, warranties, etc. etc.).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand the logic here. But, affiliates <b>chooose</b> to do business or not do business with companies like Clickbank. And it&#8217;s my opinion that companies like Clickbank can make up any rules they want to. Since the affiliate is not a consumer then they don&#8217;t have to do business with Clickbank&#8211;and vice versa. Clickbank deserves the right to pay or &#8216;not pay&#8217; companies or individuals who send them traffic.</p>
<p>A company can decide that their affiliates must have a certain type of link on their site in order to get paid. They can decide whether or not the affiliate must disclose that they&#8217;re an affiliate. Of course the affiliate shouldn&#8217;t misrepresent themselves, though.</p>
<p>When it comes to disclosure, I don&#8217;t personally think the USA&#8217;s FTC can get involved&#8211;this is a business transaction that doesn&#8217;t necessarily directly involves the consumer. It&#8217;s a referral&#8230;and the consumer clicks on a link and goes on over to <b>another site</b> where such things should be disclosed (like guarantees, warranties, etc. etc.).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Income.com Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; I Would Like To Disclose My Disclosure</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/824/blogging-full-disclosure.html#comment-33614</link>
		<dc:creator>Income.com Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; I Would Like To Disclose My Disclosure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 22:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/2007/06/blogging-full-disclosure.html#comment-33614</guid>
		<description>[...] Andy Beard recently chimed in on the discussion and had some great stuff to say about this blog disclosure issue. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Andy Beard recently chimed in on the discussion and had some great stuff to say about this blog disclosure issue. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shazad</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/824/blogging-full-disclosure.html#comment-33612</link>
		<dc:creator>shazad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 22:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/2007/06/blogging-full-disclosure.html#comment-33612</guid>
		<description>I think there is just too much information to regulate i mean how many opinions, recommendations or advertising can one distinguish  between.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there is just too much information to regulate i mean how many opinions, recommendations or advertising can one distinguish  between.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beard</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/824/blogging-full-disclosure.html#comment-33591</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 20:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/2007/06/blogging-full-disclosure.html#comment-33591</guid>
		<description>You mean you either tell people up front (a disclosure policy), or explain that to the FTC or a jury at a later date?

p.s. I have a comments policy too</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mean you either tell people up front (a disclosure policy), or explain that to the FTC or a jury at a later date?</p>
<p>p.s. I have a comments policy too</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Money From Home</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/824/blogging-full-disclosure.html#comment-33590</link>
		<dc:creator>Money From Home</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 20:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/2007/06/blogging-full-disclosure.html#comment-33590</guid>
		<description>I am with shoemoney on this.  You have to assume that if I am talking about it than I will directly or indirectly be making money from it.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am with shoemoney on this.  You have to assume that if I am talking about it than I will directly or indirectly be making money from it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Beard</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/824/blogging-full-disclosure.html#comment-33388</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 04:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/2007/06/blogging-full-disclosure.html#comment-33388</guid>
		<description>I had to make the link to the LA Times unclickable, because a while ago I unearthed that they don&#039;t allow deep linking in their terms of service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had to make the link to the LA Times unclickable, because a while ago I unearthed that they don&#8217;t allow deep linking in their terms of service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 29/34 queries in 0.006 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 500/504 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn5.andybeard.name

Served from: andybeard.eu @ 2012-02-13 08:55:11 -->
