<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Internet Business &#38; Marketing Strategy - Andy Beard &#187; 2000 bloggers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/2000-bloggers/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andybeard.eu</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing, Lead Acquisition, Online Business Strategy and Social Media with Original Opinion and Loads of Attitude</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 06:16:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Technorati Can&#8217;t Cope With Twitter, coComment, Blog Networks, and Blog Rolls</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/521/technorati-cant-cope-with-twitter-cocomment-blog-networks-and-blog-rolls.html</link>
		<comments>http://andybeard.eu/521/technorati-cant-cope-with-twitter-cocomment-blog-networks-and-blog-rolls.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 11:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blogging tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2000 bloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cocomment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[syndication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technorati]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technorati links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technorati ranking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/2007/03/technorati-cant-cope-with-twitter-cocomment-blog-networks-and-blog-rolls.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<div style="float:right;"><img src='http://cdn5.andybeard.name/wp-content/uploads/technorati-logo.png'  width="200" alt='Technorati Logo' /></div>
<p>Technorati simply can&#8217;t cope with new forms of blogging and RSS feed generation. I am not talking about splogs, which seem to still be rampant, and reblogs, likewise, but totally legitimate alternative unique content sources that are effectively blogs.</p>
<p><a href="http://andybeard.eu/521/technorati-cant-cope-with-twitter-cocomment-blog-networks-and-blog-rolls.html" class="more-link">Read more on Technorati Can&#8217;t Cope With Twitter, coComment, Blog Networks, and Blog Rolls&#8230;</a></p>
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_brick-red" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%253A%252F%252Fandybeard.eu%252F521%252Ftechnorati-cant-cope-with-twitter-cocomment-blog-networks-and-blog-rolls.html%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22small%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Technorati%20Can%27t%20Cope%20With%20Twitter%2C%20coComment%2C%20Blog%20Networks%2C%20and%20Blog%20Rolls%22%20%7D);"></div>


	Tags: <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/2000-bloggers" title="2000 bloggers" rel="tag">2000 bloggers</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/blog" title="blog" rel="tag">blog</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/blogging" title="blogging" rel="tag">blogging</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/cocomment" title="cocomment" rel="tag">cocomment</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/geek" title="geek" rel="tag">geek</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/rss" title="rss" rel="tag">rss</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/syndication" title="syndication" rel="tag">syndication</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/tech" title="tech" rel="tag">tech</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/technology" title="technology" rel="tag">technology</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/technorati" title="technorati" rel="tag">technorati</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/technorati-links" title="technorati links" rel="tag">technorati links</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/technorati-ranking" title="technorati ranking" rel="tag">technorati ranking</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/twitter" title="twitter" rel="tag">twitter</a><br />
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<div style="float:right;"><img src='http://cdn5.andybeard.name/wp-content/uploads/technorati-logo.png'  width="200" alt='Technorati Logo' /></div>
<p>Technorati simply can&#8217;t cope with new forms of blogging and RSS feed generation. I am not talking about splogs, which seem to still be rampant, and reblogs, likewise, but totally legitimate alternative unique content sources that are effectively blogs.</p>
<h3>coComment</h3>
<div style="float:right;"><img width='200' src='http://cdn5.andybeard.name/wp-content/uploads/cocomment.png' alt='Cocomment' /></div>
<p>Not too long ago, coComment introduced the ability to be able to <a href="http://andybeard.eu/2007/02/cocommentscom-new-feature-full-exclusive-story.html">claim your coComment feed on Technorati</a>, and went to the trouble of creating a very integrated claim wizard.</p>
<p>Within a few days, the very legitimate coComment feeds full of unique content were filling up Technorati links pages. It seems Technorati swiftly took action and decided that coComments feeds were not blogs, and silently nerfed them.</p>
<p>coComment feeds are not splogs, they are a record of activity all over the web that contain content directly linked to <a href="http://www.cocomment.com/technorati/comments/andybeard">individual people, and real discussions</a>.<br />
Technorati could use coComment as a way to filter out splogs, because blogs that don&#8217;t get comments might be a good indication of splogs and reblogs.</p>
<h3>Twitter</h3>
<div style="float:right;"><img src='http://cdn5.andybeard.name/wp-content/uploads/twitter.png' alt='Twitter' /></div>
<p>Twitter allows you to post a Technorati claim. I have claimed my <a href="http://twitter.com/AndyBeard">Twitter feed</a>, and so have a <a href="http://twitter.com/byosko">couple of</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/pauloflaherty">my friends</a>. Update: <a href="http://blog.oflaherty.dk/2007/03/12/twittering-the-technorati-monster/">Paul has written about doing so here now</a>.</p>
<p><img src='http://cdn5.andybeard.name/wp-content/uploads/twitter-technorati-claims.png' alt='Twitter Claims in Technorati' /></p>
<p>Twitter also has a blogroll of sorts. There are links on the sidebar to the people you are following which are links Technorati can see.</p>
<p><img src='http://cdn5.andybeard.name/wp-content/uploads/twitter-blogroll.png' alt='Twitter Blogroll' /></p>
<p>The result if people claim their Twitter account in Technorati and their friends do the same is clear to see.</p>
<p><img src='http://cdn5.andybeard.name/wp-content/uploads/twitter-technorati.png' alt='Technorati Links to Twitter' /></p>
<p>Now what happens if you are a Twitter user like Robert Scoble with 100s, actually over 1000 followers.</p>
<p><img src='http://cdn5.andybeard.name/wp-content/uploads/scobleizer-twitter-on-technorati.png' alt='Scobleizer Technorati Results' /></p>
<p>Not all of Robert&#8217;s followers have claimed their feeds, and Technorati hasn&#8217;t found them all, but that won&#8217;t take long.</p>
<h3>Technorati Can&#8217;t Cope</h3>
<p>coComment is very legitimate user generated content &#8211; if I fed my coComment feed into a blog, it would be looked on by Technorati as legitimate, so why negate it&#8217;s effects only days after it was introduced?</p>
<p>Twitter is actually less legitimate than coComment &#8211; you are limited to very few characters unlike blog comments which can often be longer than many blog posts.<br />
Twitter has a Blog Roll of sorts, that is providing cross linking, and soon Robert Scobles Twitter might enter the Technorati Top 100 &#8211; you only need 3300 blogs linking to a blog to hit the Technorati 100 currently, Robert already has 1000 followers and I am sure he will easily clock up more very quickly.<br />
The problem for Technorati is that Robert&#8217;s Twitter feed is legitimate content on a different platform, and that people are choosing to link to him from their &#8220;Twitter Rolls&#8221;</p>
<h3>Blog Rolls</h3>
<p>One of the reasons blogs that are part of blog networks gain Technorati rankings fast is their sitewide links to other blogs in the network.<br />
As I pointed out recently when <a href="http://andybeard.eu/2007/02/2000-bloggers-and-hippocracy.html">defending 2000 Bloggers</a>, there are blogs that are part of blog networks that haven&#8217;t posted for more than a year, but due to blogrolls have very high Technorati ranks, without any links from within the content.</p>
<h3>Widgets, Plugins and Themes</h3>
<p>Various members of the WordPress development team used to dominate the Technorati Top 100 because of the default blogroll links. Nothing wrong with the links which are well deserved, everything wrong for Technorati counting them.</p>
<p>Currently the best way to game Technorati is to create widgets and themes with links to the author. Technorati picks them up as links from the blog.<br />
Some of the widgets can do this in quite a collective way, such as community blogroll widgets that add 100s of cross links to all members of the community. Then again they are only doing the same as &#8220;legitimate&#8221; blog networks.</p>
<h3>How to Fix Technorati</h3>
<p>Technorati have to change the way they look on links completely, and only count links within content. That may mean their spiders have to start working in a totally different way, and current link totals will twist real results for 6 months.</p>
<p>Technorati should be counting alternative blogging platforms such as coComment and Twitter, but again, they should only count links from within the content.</p>
<p>Twitter is <a href="http://www.techmeme.com/070311/p26#a070311p26">dominating</a> <a href="http://www.techmeme.com/070312/p1#a070312p1">Techmeme</a> <a href="http://www.techmeme.com/070311/p21#a070311p21">today</a>.</p>
<p>I love Pete Cashmore&#8217;s <a href="http://mashable.com/2007/03/11/twitter/">timeline of blogging</a>, Marshall Kirkpatrick did a <a href="http://mashable.com/2007/03/11/twitter/">&#8220;sitting on the fence&#8221; roundup</a>, (i.e. unbiased reporting), and <a href="http://www.brianalvey.com/2007/03/10/putting-the-twit-in-twitter/">Brian Alvey</a> put a unique perspective on things, (he should be thinking of adding a Twitter widget to Blogsmith for a USP).</p>
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_brick-red" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%253A%252F%252Fandybeard.eu%252F521%252Ftechnorati-cant-cope-with-twitter-cocomment-blog-networks-and-blog-rolls.html%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22small%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Technorati%20Can%27t%20Cope%20With%20Twitter%2C%20coComment%2C%20Blog%20Networks%2C%20and%20Blog%20Rolls%22%20%7D);"></div>


	Tags: <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/2000-bloggers" title="2000 bloggers" rel="tag">2000 bloggers</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/blog" title="blog" rel="tag">blog</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/blogging" title="blogging" rel="tag">blogging</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/cocomment" title="cocomment" rel="tag">cocomment</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/geek" title="geek" rel="tag">geek</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/rss" title="rss" rel="tag">rss</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/syndication" title="syndication" rel="tag">syndication</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/tech" title="tech" rel="tag">tech</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/technology" title="technology" rel="tag">technology</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/technorati" title="technorati" rel="tag">technorati</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/technorati-links" title="technorati links" rel="tag">technorati links</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/technorati-ranking" title="technorati ranking" rel="tag">technorati ranking</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/twitter" title="twitter" rel="tag">twitter</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://andybeard.eu/521/technorati-cant-cope-with-twitter-cocomment-blog-networks-and-blog-rolls.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2000 Bloggers and Hypocrisy</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/401/2000-bloggers-and-hippocracy.html</link>
		<comments>http://andybeard.eu/401/2000-bloggers-and-hippocracy.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 17:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2000 bloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogspot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microformats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nofollow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tagging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tags]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technorati]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/2007/02/2000-bloggers-and-hippocracy.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p>I actually applied only recently for <a href="http://tinobuntic.blogspot.com/">Tino Buntie</a> to add my name to the 2000 Bloggers collage. I thought it was a cool idea, although the SEO benefit is probably minimal simply because although massive cross-linking is happening, it could be looked on as:-</p>
<p><a href="http://andybeard.eu/401/2000-bloggers-and-hippocracy.html" class="more-link">Read more on 2000 Bloggers and Hypocrisy&#8230;</a></p>
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_brick-red" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%253A%252F%252Fandybeard.eu%252F401%252F2000-bloggers-and-hippocracy.html%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22small%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%222000%20Bloggers%20and%20Hypocrisy%22%20%7D);"></div>


	Tags: <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/2000-bloggers" title="2000 bloggers" rel="tag">2000 bloggers</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/blogspot" title="blogspot" rel="tag">blogspot</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/links" title="links" rel="tag">links</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/microformats" title="microformats" rel="tag">microformats</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/nofollow" title="nofollow" rel="tag">nofollow</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/tagging" title="tagging" rel="tag">tagging</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/tags" title="tags" rel="tag">tags</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/technorati" title="technorati" rel="tag">technorati</a><br />
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>I actually applied only recently for <a href="http://tinobuntic.blogspot.com/">Tino Buntie</a> to add my name to the 2000 Bloggers collage. I thought it was a cool idea, although the SEO benefit is probably minimal simply because although massive cross-linking is happening, it could be looked on as:-</p>
<p>2000-2000=0</p>
<p>If everyone grabs all the images and sticks it on a page on their site, it is effectively like a link exchange directory which people have been doing for years. Google can certain filter links like that out with no problem.</p>
<p>Obviously it is not quite so simplistic, and it should be noted that there is a level of editorial in this. It is real blogs created by real people, and Tino visits the sites to check.</p>
<p>It is also important that these in general are not site wide links &#8211; someone with any sense if they did post a full collage would do it on a page a little deeper on their domain, just because of page load times.</p>
<p>Unfortunately this apparently has <a href="http://technorati.com/weblog/2007/02/283.html">upset the balance at Technorati</a>, and I am actually happy about that, because it brings lots of things out into the open.</p>
<h3>Technorati</h3>
<p>Technorati has great prominence in the search engines using other people&#8217;s content that people willing let them index, but the reason they have such prominence for all those cool keywords is because they have created one of the greatest linkbait systems on the internet, Technorati tags. The microformat even defines:-</p>
<blockquote><p>
The destination of a rel=&#8221;tag&#8221; hyperlink is required to be a tag space (a place that collates or defines tags), where the last segment of the path of the URL is the tag</p></blockquote>
<p>Unless you have your own tag pages internally, there isn&#8217;t a huge amount of tag spaces to link to, and the default choice is Technorati for most people, though there are a few other options such as Wikipedia and a few PPC sites.</p>
<p>A while back Technorati started to use &#8220;nofollow&#8221; on their links to their sources of information to stop benefiting splogs, but if search engine rank wasn&#8217;t important to Technorati, they would create all their  widgets and links with the nofollow code. But business is business and Technorati make money from advertising.<br />
It is quite possible that Google and the other search engines have already had to take action to devalue the weight of Technorati tags, not too much, but enough so that the top search results for all those terms frequently used wasn&#8217;t always Technorati, which might be full of untrusted user generated content.</p>
<p>Technorati created their own importance in search results &#8211; they are one of the few &#8220;search engines&#8221; that appear in natural search results. Using robots.txt would solve that, but Technorati like the traffic.</p>
<p>I actually love Technorati, but I think this is making mountains out of molehills. There are bigger issues which effectively ensure that the z-listers have no chance of rising to the surface without some creative effort.</p>
<p>It should be noted that Technorati haven&#8217;t issued any kind of penalty to the participants in the 2000 Bloggers meme, as I just read over on <a href="http://www.designsojourn.com/index.php/2007/02/08/blog-meme-participants-all-get-scared-and-run-for-the-hills/">Design Sojourn</a> in a comment by Ian Kallen of Technorati.</p>
<blockquote><p>
Just to clarify: Technorati is not taking punitive measures against 2000 Blogger participants. What was announced was simply an adjustment to our indexing to filter out copy-and-pasted sets of links since our ranking is premised on links that are more conventional social gestures such as replies and citations. There is certainly a good deal of FUD being posted elsewhere about elitism, coercion, and so forth but given what was actually announced, I hope youâ€™ll see through the subterfuge and feel assured that thereâ€™s no heavy hand to be scared of. Weâ€™re here to serve you and help you make your voice heard, weâ€™re listening.<br />
best regards,<br />
-Ian
</p></blockquote>
<h3>Blog Networks</h3>
<p>2000 bloggers, it is only a single page on most of the blogs that might be affecting the Technorati ranking results. With blog networks small and large, all those sitewide sidebars also affect Technorati in a major way, and so does preferential linking to same network sites.</p>
<h3>Employee Networks</h3>
<p>Robert Scoble has discussed <a href="http://scobleizer.com/2006/12/04/microsoft-worlds-greatest-seo/">Microsofts internal blogger mailing list</a> and the way they can effectively Googlebomb any product for a brand name. Whilst they might not have everyone on their blog roll (3000 bloggers), I am sure there is a lot of internal linking. </p>
<h3>Widgets</h3>
<p>There are a lot of widgets out there that give real links back to their creators, and whilst this might not affect blogs it certainly affects search results. The thing is the links in most cases are justified because they go to information pages about the widget.<br />
<a href="http://www.searchenginejournal.com/?p=4323">Links are just pointers</a> as Carsten recently discussed over on Search Engine Journal.</p>
<p>If I tag something with the word &#8220;WordPress&#8221;, it often ends up in a sidebar RSS feed on a blog tracking wordpress, or someones shared feed reader stream that is being indexed. That link appears in Technorati&#8217;s index, even if it is temporary.</p>
<h3>Syndicated Content</h3>
<p>The web, and Technorati are full of syndicated news stories, press releases and articles.</p>
<p>Some of my blog content occasionally gets syndicated, and that appears in Technorati reselts. Some of it is on popular sites, &#8220;legitimate syndication&#8221; &#8211; other times it is &#8220;illegitimate syndication&#8221;, which would be classed as legitimate if it was on a PR7+ site, but because it is a new site collecting snippets of blog posts on a single specific theme, they are referred to as splogs. At least most of them link back to me with a live link to the source, and if they pick it up   directly rather than from Technorati, they get links in the content as well.</p>
<p>I have seen uncliamed RSS feeds in Technorati in the 5-6K range simply because the feed was being syndicated.</p>
<h3>Other Tag Farms / Indexes</h3>
<p>The good new is it seem that Technorati already filter out feeds from places like the WordPress.com tag index. It is quite likely that index still affects other search results in a big way. <a href="http://andybeard.eu/2006/11/wordpresscom-linking-structure.html">WordPress.com don&#8217;t use nofollow</a> for their links to/from the indexes as I have previously discussed.</p>
<h3>Linkbait</h3>
<p>This <a href="http://www.searchmarketinggurus.com/search_marketing_gurus/2007/01/2000_bloggers_t.html">interview with Tino</a> carried out by Li Evans is now been highlighted as proof that Tino was doing this all just as link bait.</p>
<p>If you create something cool, people link to you. Lots of people create cool things for links and don&#8217;t get slammed. Lots of people deliberately highlight controversial stories over and over again just to get attention. Hell even I am writing this hoping I might get a link or 2 from people interested in a different opinion. (and I don&#8217;t have nofollow on my trackbacks)</p>
<p>What Tino didn&#8217;t expect is that people would carry the thing one stage further and copy all the images with links to post on their blogs.<br />
Tino has suggested a widget, for the future, but that could easily be created with Ajax so that it doesn&#8217;t affect results in Google and Technorati, and is just there to give people somewhere cool to continue their browsing, human selected.</p>
<p>Even <a href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/seo-advice-linkbait-and-linkbaiting/">Matt Cutts believes in good link bait</a> &#8211; I wonder what he thinks of 2000 Bloggers&#8230;</p>
<h3>Conclusion</h3>
<p>2000 Bloggers was just a blip, or a small bush fire easily snuffed out.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.2kbloggers.com/photo-montage/">2000 Bloggers Lives on</a> &#8211; </p>
<p>For some reason every single link on <a href="http://tinobuntic.blogspot.com/">Tinos blog is now nofollow</a> &#8211; I didn&#8217;t think that is possible with blogger as many thing are included automatically &#8211; was such action really called for?</p>
<p>I am going to dedicate this post to the shared stance I have with <a href="http://danemorgan.com/follow-me-and-stop-caving-in-to-the-barbarians/78">Dane Morgan on Nofollow</a>. If you don&#8217;t understand what he means by &#8220;Pink Boxes&#8221;, this post I wrote a while ago on <a href="http://andybeard.eu/2006/12/nofollow-and-pink-boxes.html">nofollow</a> will help.</p>
<p><strong>Update: I have done some more snooping and it seems that a number of sites hosted on Blogger have the following added:-</strong></p>
<p>meta name=&#8221;ROBOTS&#8221; content=&#8221;NOINDEX,NOFOLLOW&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know anyone that would do something like that deliberately to a blog they had worked on for months / years.</p>
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_brick-red" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%253A%252F%252Fandybeard.eu%252F401%252F2000-bloggers-and-hippocracy.html%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22small%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%222000%20Bloggers%20and%20Hypocrisy%22%20%7D);"></div>


	Tags: <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/2000-bloggers" title="2000 bloggers" rel="tag">2000 bloggers</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/blogspot" title="blogspot" rel="tag">blogspot</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/links" title="links" rel="tag">links</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/microformats" title="microformats" rel="tag">microformats</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/nofollow" title="nofollow" rel="tag">nofollow</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/tagging" title="tagging" rel="tag">tagging</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/tags" title="tags" rel="tag">tags</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/technorati" title="technorati" rel="tag">technorati</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://andybeard.eu/401/2000-bloggers-and-hippocracy.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 33/53 queries in 0.013 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 1203/1248 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn5.andybeard.name

Served from: andybeard.eu @ 2012-02-13 03:20:09 -->
