<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Internet Business &#38; Marketing Strategy - Andy Beard &#187; disqus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/disqus/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andybeard.eu</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing, Lead Acquisition, Online Business Strategy and Social Media with Original Opinion and Loads of Attitude</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 06:16:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>WordPress Comment SEO Solutions</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/2065/wordpress-comment-seo.html</link>
		<comments>http://andybeard.eu/2065/wordpress-comment-seo.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blogging tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plugins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog commenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disqus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dofollow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jskit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nofollow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[syndication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WordPress SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/?p=2065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Changing the way WordPress and other content management systems handle comments for SEO, members areas, aggregated conversations &#038; more.<br />
I am sure some of this post is going to blow people's brains, though this is only the tip of the iceberg.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>I am sure some of this post is going to blow people&#8217;s brains, though this is only the tip of the iceberg.</p>
<h2>WordPress Comment Solutions</h2>
<p>Shaun almost a month ago <a href="http://www.hobo-web.co.uk/seo-blog/index.php/hobo-custom-link-love-for-wordpress/" target="_blank">released a modified version</a> of Lucia&#8217;s <a href="http://money.bigbucksblogger.com/lucias-linky-love-a-dofollow-plugin-to-foil-human-comment-spammers/" target="_blank">Linky Love</a> that removes links from comments rather than nofollow them as a partial solution to Google&#8217;s changes to PageRank distribution in regards nofollow.</p>
<p>Dave Naylor is also <a href="http://www.davidnaylor.co.uk/blog-comments.html" target="_blank">doing something similar</a></p>
<p>I also now need to take you back to a <a href="http://www.seomoz.org/blog/google-says-yes-you-can-still-sculpt-pagerank-no-you-cant-do-it-with-nofollow#jtc88164" target="_blank">comment I left over on SEOmoz</a></p>
<div>
<blockquote><p>Option E &#8211; Increase the amount of internal linking and flatten site architecture.</p>
<p>My old Sandcastles linking structure works great with the new algos, though there is now a need to remove external links totally from dupicate content pages rather than nofollow them.</p>
<p>WordPress does this by default with their really ugly automatic snippets</p>
<p>Option F &#8211; there is an even better way, that maximises the benefit of user generated content, still providing dofollow links, but retaining 95%+ of the juice from all external links on a page, without using nofollow at all.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Vladomir Prelovac has come up with what I would regard as a <a href="http://www.prelovac.com/vladimir/seo-super-comments-wordpress-plugin-released">partial solution to this problem</a></p>
<p>I am glad someone has done this as I have been dropping hints about taking this approach for the last year in various places, back to the old Webbbs days, though it needs taking a few steps further to be truly effective.</p>
<p>There are however some big monster bugbears that need to be considered with this approach, just like with tag pages.<br />
The benefits you will see on his site, with a huge amount of PageRank to play with from the release of WordPress Themes are potentially significant, whereas with a smaller site it can lead to complications, and you might for instance want to noindex the newly created comment pages ;) Vladomir doesn&#8217;t use tag pages extensively, more selectively.</p>
<p>For the last six months or so, my understanding of how Google ranks pages has changed significantly, in part due to studying the way Google handles huge sites such as Blogcatalog &amp; Technorati, but it would be wrong for me to publish details without clearance from Tony at <a href="http://blogcatalog.com" target="_blank">Blogcatalog</a> because I had access to their analytics.</p>
<p><strong>Whilst a lot of it would be speculative&#8230; almost like a fairy story, for some it might be more akin to a lightening strike than a light bulb moment.</strong></p>
<p>Imagine you have a choice between having a tag page or a comment page in Google&#8217;s index</p>
<ul>
<li>A tag page you can specify the exact title tag</li>
<li>A page created with SEO Super Comments you can&#8217;t, in many ways the comment is about as optimized as a Tweet on twitter.</li>
</ul>
<p>Twitter&#8217;s upstream <a href="http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/twitter.com">based on Alexa</a> is only 10% Google.com, so maybe 20% overall &#8211; a large proportion would be navigational queries &amp; Twitter account holder names.I am not 100% confident about Alexa upstream numbers, but they might be more accurate for Twitter than many sites.</p>
<p>You would get an occasional tweet ranking for very long tail terms, but it is not significant.</p>
<p>So if you are creating new pages for comments, you would want them in the index only under specific circumstances.</p>
<ul>
<li>Existing flat site architecture with all original content in primary index</li>
<li>Your categories are indexed and viable landing pages</li>
<li>You have your tag pages sufficiently indexed which may require various techniques to make the content more unique and useful.</li>
<li>Have ways to use comment data on tag pages</li>
<li>Have ways to create tag pages based purely on comments and 3rd party content ;)</li>
<li>The permalink for a comment from comment feeds points to the new pages, not to an anchor/fragment/&#8221;#name&#8221; &#8211; this has been something that needed fixing anyway, because permalinks on WordPress posts with lots of comments are currently broken, because comments can move from page1 to page2 &#8211; there are lots of ways to then use this RSS feed pointing to unique URLs on your site ;)</li>
<li>Rewrite rules for comment URLs</li>
<li>Link to a comment should use anchor text based on the title</li>
<li>Link from a name should provide all comments from that user on a single page</li>
<li>Extensive use of Ajax &#8211; this gets a bit complicated, and it would be experimental, but why have the whole comment on the post permalink at all? At least from a spider perspective. A representation of the comments can be pulled in as pre-cached page fragments. Comments could also be pulled into member profiles if a person commenting is also in some way a site member, and maybe in that situation an individual commenter page should be totally replaced by a member page.</li>
<li>Integration with social media &#8211; if you are pulling in tweets, friendfeed etc, give those a page as well, and then allow people to even comment on those directly from your blog, and push the data back out to whichever service.</li>
<li>Pull more data from trackbacks/pingbacks &#8211; grab an excerpt and host it on your site on a unique page. If someone comments on it from your site, send a pingback</li>
</ul>
<h2>The Future Of Commenting And Aggregation</h2>
<p>An even more radical approach would be to totally get rid of &#8220;comments&#8221; as a unique entity, and many other social sites for that matter, and have only unique personal streams of media, long or short form, video, pictures, text or a mixture, and what appears on other sites, whether on a blog as a comment, or on Twitter, Youtube or an social site would just be a syndicated copy of your original content. Just one permalink for the original content, with full ownership and privacy controls over who could see it.</p>
<p>In many ways Youtube is just a video feed reader where you syndicate your unique video, and you should link back to the original source, and get the original source ranking :)</p>
<p>What I am suggesting is a somewhat reverse approach to &#8220;<a href="http://www.js-kit.com/echo/">Echo</a>&#8221; recently launched in private beta or the Friendfeed aggregation.</p>
<p>A single source that you push out to other sites, rather than a multitude of aggregators. More like Tumblr or Posterous, but with much more control.</p>
<p>As a marketer however, it makes it difficult to reward comment participation without some kind of additional registration process.</p>
<h2>The Complexities Of Syndicated Comments &amp; Social Mentions</h2>
<p>What really turns your mind upside-down is when you have a situation where you have a private blog post in a members area, and someone leaves a comment which is specific to the private content.</p>
<p>The commenter needs to maintain access controls, but at the same time the owner of the site with private content needs control as well, which can possibly be overridden. Who gets priority and ultimate control?</p>
<p>Who would have moderation rights? If moderated, would it be only the syndicated copy on a publishers site, or the canonical version maintained by the commenter.</p>
<p>Do you really want to mention in an &#8220;echo&#8221; on your blog that you cross-posted the same content to 100 social media sites?</p>
<h2>Disqus?</h2>
<p>I recently highlighted <a href="http://andybeard.eu/1904/disqus-why-95-of-bloggers-should-switch.html" target="_blank">Disqus as a solution</a>, it still is, but my reservations are increasing after using the service for a month &#8211; whilst the WordPress integration is clearly stated as being beta, I am going to call it a very raw beta &#8211; there are tons of problems with synchronization and comment moderation leaves a lot to be desired. My last support ticket to them was 6 days ago, with a second full comment export to try to get sync sorted out remains unanswered.</p>
<p>I have informed them <a href="http://disqus.disqus.com/disqus_problems_migrating_back_to_wordpress/" target="_blank">already that I am pulling the plug</a> &#8211; the synchronization attempts are hopefully to fix problems that might prevent others having problems in the future.</p>
<p>There are other issues that I don&#8217;t feel should be aired here on the blog. I am giving them some time to hopefully get them fixed.</p>
<h2>Other WordPress Plugins?</h2>
<p>A big shout out to 4 other plugins I have been using recently</p>
<p><a href="http://www.turleando.com.ar/autoptimize/">Autooptimize</a> &#8211; so far it is the best CSS / Javascript optimization plugin I have used (and I have used quite a few) and the author has been highly responsive with fixes to various plugins and widgets. It sets expires and gzip correctly too.</p>
<p>What I have also done is hacked things so Disqus uses local CSS and images, that I will eventually be able to migrate to a CDN, though the Disqus CSS brings up all kinds of horrible warnings in Yslow and Page Speed Firefox Plugins.</p>
<p><a href="http://murmatrons.armadillo.homeip.net/features/experimental-eaccelerator-wp-super-cache">Wp Supercache Plus</a> &#8211; I am currently using it with Eaccelerator &#8211; I am using the &#8220;bleeding edge&#8221; version from SVN, and am in the process of <a href="http://murmatrons.armadillo.homeip.net/features/experimental-eaccelerator-wp-super-cache" target="_blank">implementing fragments</a> with thematic &#8211; I had a few problems using it with memcached WP Supercache combined with <a href="http://svn.wp-plugins.org/memcached/">Memcached object-cache.php</a>.<br />
Fragment caching with comments especially will reduce server load each time a new comment is added to a blog under heavy load, such as a product launch.</p>
<p>Probably also long overdue is a mention of Tim&#8217;s <a href="http://www.newmedias.co.uk/wordpress-membership/">WordPress Membership Plugin</a>. On the surface most plugin offerings look the same, it is only when you look at the code and how they have overcome hurdles that some solutions shine &#8211; I was involved a little with the early stages over a year ago and many features have since been copied, and other offerings have leapfrogged Your Members in more obvious ways, but at its core I still believe Your Members to be the most flexible solution (<a href="http://www.newmedias.co.uk/support/" target="_blank">oh and you can see the support in public</a>). There are lots of useful hooks and ways you can extend the platform, relatively easily, though a little PHP knowledge goes a long way. It is also pretty secure.<br />
The full reasons deserve a lot longer post, but other solutions get promoted extensively without extensive research into alternatives &#8211; I need to spend another $500 on alternative solutions before I can realistically write a comprehensive review.<br />
With Your Members it is possible to control access level to comments as well as the posts themselves. If you have a private post, you also want to selectively keep the comments private.</p>
<p><a href="http://faq-tastic.com/faqtastic-lite-free/" target="_blank">FAQ-Tastic</a> &#8211; Zain now has both a free light version (that is very flexible) and a pro version &#8211; it is a serious solution for anyone looking to leverage their audience to create new product or content offerings. I am frequently asked to add an &#8220;Ask Andy&#8221; section here on the blog, but I will most likely do it in a more private area.<br />
Comments on custom areas of WordPress is something I don&#8217;t think 3rd party systems will ever handle effectively.</p>
<p>This post has been a little bit of a mixed bag, but hopefully you find something useful &amp; worth sharing with others.</p>
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_brick-red" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%253A%252F%252Fandybeard.eu%252F2065%252Fwordpress-comment-seo.html%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22small%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22WordPress%20Comment%20SEO%20Solutions%22%20%7D);"></div>


	Tags: <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/blog-commenting" title="blog commenting" rel="tag">blog commenting</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/disqus" title="disqus" rel="tag">disqus</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/dofollow" title="dofollow" rel="tag">dofollow</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/jskit" title="jskit" rel="tag">jskit</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/nofollow" title="nofollow" rel="tag">nofollow</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/social-media" title="Social Media" rel="tag">Social Media</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/syndication" title="syndication" rel="tag">syndication</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/wordpress-seo" title="WordPress SEO" rel="tag">WordPress SEO</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://andybeard.eu/2065/wordpress-comment-seo.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>92</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Disqus &#8211; Why 95% Of Bloggers Should Switch</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/1904/disqus-why-95-of-bloggers-should-switch.html</link>
		<comments>http://andybeard.eu/1904/disqus-why-95-of-bloggers-should-switch.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 14:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blogging tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog commenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog Comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comment spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disqus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intense debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jskit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[matt cutts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[membership-sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PageRank Sculpting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[startup]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/?p=1904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When <a href="http://disqus.com">Disqus</a> first launched, I was a little critical because I like to maintain control of comments, give commenters the benefit of Dofollow links, and ultimately retain control of their user generated content.

I now feel that 95% of bloggers should switch to using Disqus, though I have some reservations.

These are some of the reasons why:-]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>When <a href="http://disqus.com">Disqus</a> first launched, I was a little critical because I like to maintain control of comments, give commenters the benefit of Dofollow links, and ultimately retain control of their user generated content.</p>
<p>I now feel that 95% of bloggers should switch to using Disqus, though I have some reservations.</p>
<p>These are some of the reasons why:-</p>
<ul>
<li>Matt Cutts today confirmed that <a href="http://andybeard.eu/1865/pagerank-sculpting-dead.html">nofollow links</a> can reduce the amount of PageRank that flow to internal pages. The easiest current solution to solve this problem is to use Javascript for comments.<br />
It is an external javascript file, which Google can&#8217;t really handle currently, and even if they did, the chances are it might only count as a single link to your disqus discussion.<br />
Blogstorm has gone into the <a href="http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/pagerank-sculpting-blog-comments/">problems facing comment links</a> in more detail, something I highlighted when Matt first mentioned this clarification at SMX.</li>
<li>Matt Cutts in the same post highlighted again who you link to matters, and I think Google is going to place more and more emphasis on this. It is a lot of work for the average blogger to keep control of user generated content, and even the best comments sometimes come with spammy links. I have always maintained that &#8220;dofollow&#8221; isn&#8217;t for everyone because of the time commitment.</li>
<li>Disqus is universal &#8211; it can be installed on every major blogging platform &#8211; many SEO solutions won&#8217;t be universal or easy to implement</li>
<li>Can Spam &#038; Email Deliverability &#8211; this is 50/50 &#8211; I have highlighted in the past that <a href="http://andybeard.eu/482/how-to-setup-email-notifications-to-avoid-your-wordpress-blog-being-suspended.html">emails being sent from your own domain can be a significant liability</a><br />
<blockquote><p>It is your choice based on your own research and the legal advice you have received whether you think emails being sent from your domain which are not totally under your control could represent a problem.<br />
I honestly don&#8217;t know if Safe Harbour rules might apply to email delivery. I don&#8217;t know of any blog owner who has had problems either from a legal perspective, or with their hosting or domain registrars, but then I personally only know a few people who have been killed in car accidents &#8211; I know a lot more people who drive cars than publish business blogs. </p></blockquote>
</li>
<li>Invalidated Cache &#8211; this is a major consideration for high traffic blogs, and potentially product launches. The javascript doesn&#8217;t change on each new page load, thus your cached content also doesn&#8217;t change (if you just use their javascript on your page) &#8211; this can represent a major reduction in server load, even if you are using some kind of Op Cache (eaccelerator APC Xcache), RAM based page cache (Memcached) or more advanced techniques using page chunking. Forget conventional WP Cache / Supercache for product launches, it just can&#8217;t cope on its own.</li>
<li>Social Media Viral Effect &#8211; <a href="http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/06/how-are-we-signing-into-this-blog.html">the social media viral effect</a> of using Discus is significant. Not many people are exposed to services such as backtype, but tons of people use Facebook &#8211; implementation of Facebook, Twitter and other logins for commenting whilst possible with WordPress isn&#8217;t trivial, and that is more plugins to deal with, more server load etc.</li>
<li>Get to visit Disqus more often &#8211; I sometimes leave comments on other blogs that are using Disqus, and sometimes the comment notifications don&#8217;t get to me (deliverability issues) &#8211; I just noticed on my <a href="http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/06/how-are-we-signing-into-this-blog.html">Andy Beard Disqus profile</a> that <a href="http://rafer.disqus.com/">Scott Rafer</a> responded to something important 2 months ago, and I didn&#8217;t see it.</li>
</ul>
<h3>Negative Side of Disqus</h3>
<ul>
<li>The SEO of the site needs some major work &#8211; it is almost insulting that the link to Twitter on my Disqus profile is followed, yet the link to my blog isn&#8217;t. The anchor text from a conversation on Disqus back to a blog isn&#8217;t exactly ideal. This is how <a rel="nofollow" href="http://74.125.77.132/search?q=cache:sUAuzQ-xBO4J:disqus.com/people/AndyBeard/+andy+beard+site:disqus.com&#038;cd=7&#038;hl=pl&#038;ct=clnk&#038;gl=pl&#038;client=firefox-a">Google sees my Discus Profile</a></li>
<li>Google is very bad at indexing content on Disqus &#8211; this is partially due to the Disqus SEO problems &#8211; certainly a conversation I took part in 4 days ago isn&#8217;t indexed.</li>
<li>I have heard reports that managing spam can be an issue, though I haven&#8217;t tested it, I rarely see spam on highly popular blogs</li>
<li>It isn&#8217;t suitable for private content &#8211; you would have to use alternative commenting on private posts if you are running your blog as a membership site. That is something that can be worked around.</li>
<li>It is hard, maybe impossible to market to people after they have left a comment. With standard WordPress comments, after someone has left an email, you could present a page offering site membership, a one time offer, or an affiliate product &#8211; even suggest related content of interest.</li>
<li>If you have lots of niche blogs, you will hardly want to include all of them on a single Disqus profile if you want to stay under the radar of your competitors. How would a blog network cope? Retain ownership? I can&#8217;t see B5 Network with a profile of 300+ blogs in Disqus and managing who can moderate comments.</li>
</ul>
<p>The SEO problems with Disqus are fixable, and in the current Google climate could offer significant advantages &#8211; plus Disqus could conservatively gain at least 400% traffic even without new adoption.<br />
It is possible even if they also gave much more SEO friendly links throughout the whole site.</p>
<p>I am recommending Disqus above competitors JSKit and Intense Debate because both of these services the email subscriptions don&#8217;t stack in Gmail &#8211; a nightmare if you subscribe to comments on a popular blog, plus I believe there is more chance of Disqus fixing problems for a win/win solution.</p>
<p>Who knows, we might even get Twitter to remove nofollows too&#8230; eventually</p>
<p>Disclosure:- I am recommending Disqus even though part of my startup plans would have involved an SEO, product launch and membership friendly system with refined marketing funnel. If I ever get it off the ground, there are ways to migrate back from Disqus.</p>
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_brick-red" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%253A%252F%252Fandybeard.eu%252F1904%252Fdisqus-why-95-of-bloggers-should-switch.html%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22small%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Disqus%20-%20Why%2095%25%20Of%20Bloggers%20Should%20Switch%22%20%7D);"></div>


	Tags: <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/blog-commenting" title="blog commenting" rel="tag">blog commenting</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/blog-comments" title="Blog Comments" rel="tag">Blog Comments</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/comment-spam" title="comment spam" rel="tag">comment spam</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/disqus" title="disqus" rel="tag">disqus</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/intense-debate" title="intense debate" rel="tag">intense debate</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/jskit" title="jskit" rel="tag">jskit</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/matt-cutts" title="matt cutts" rel="tag">matt cutts</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/membership-sites" title="membership-sites" rel="tag">membership-sites</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/pagerank-sculpting" title="PageRank Sculpting" rel="tag">PageRank Sculpting</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/seo" title="SEO Blog" rel="tag">SEO Blog</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/startup" title="startup" rel="tag">startup</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://andybeard.eu/1904/disqus-why-95-of-bloggers-should-switch.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>106</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Have Blogs At All? &#8211; The Race To Kill Blogging</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/1295/the-death-of-blogging.html</link>
		<comments>http://andybeard.eu/1295/the-death-of-blogging.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 02:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blogging tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compuserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disqus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fidonet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[friendfeed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greasemonkey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prodigy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usenet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/2008/03/the-death-of-blogging.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>How would a human differentiate between the original source for a piece of content on the web, and a syndicated or splogged copy?</strong>

One of the most important factors would almost certainly be the comments.

<strong>What is one of the primary reasons people click through from an RSS feed to actually visit a blog?</strong>

Almost certainly it is either to read comments others have made, or to make one of their own. It is not to view advertising... at least for most.

<strong>How would a machine, such as Google differentiate between original source and whether a piece of content is valuable to include in its search index?</strong>

Factors could include:-
<ul>
	<li>The content within comments - keywords, language structure, length etc</li>
	<li>The number of comments</li>
	<li>Update frequency of the page (gaining additional comments over time)</li>
</ul>

Sure there are other factors, such as links

People link to comments on blogs, typically using a #fragment - the link is going to the blog permalink page

<b>How many times have you found the answer to a question by reading a blog comment?</b>

For me it is actually quite frequently - comments quite often provide alternatives to the original content that offer improvements.

<b>A large part of blogging is engaging your audience in conversation</b>

<b>Business blogging is about engaging your customers</b>

It hasn't happened yet, but soon a blog might become no more than an RSS feed that is read on another domain, and discussed in small communities of friends, sometimes private, sometimes public, but still fragmented conversation.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><strong>How would a human differentiate between the original source for a piece of content on the web, and a syndicated or splogged copy?</strong></p>
<p>One of the most important factors would almost certainly be the comments.</p>
<p><strong>What is one of the primary reasons people click through from an RSS feed to actually visit a blog?</strong></p>
<p>Almost certainly it is either to read comments others have made, or to make one of their own. It is not to view advertising&#8230; at least for most.</p>
<p><strong>How would a machine, such as Google differentiate between original source and whether a piece of content is valuable to include in its search index?</strong></p>
<p>Factors could include:-</p>
<ul>
<li>The content within comments &#8211; keywords, language structure, length etc</li>
<li>The number of comments</li>
<li>Update frequency of the page (gaining additional comments over time)</li>
</ul>
<p>Sure there are other factors, such as links</p>
<p>People link to comments on blogs, typically using a #fragment &#8211; the link is going to the blog permalink page</p>
<p><b>How many times have you found the answer to a question by reading a blog comment?</b></p>
<p>For me it is actually quite frequently &#8211; comments quite often provide alternatives to the original content that offer improvements.</p>
<p><b>A large part of blogging is engaging your audience in conversation</b></p>
<p><b>Business blogging is about engaging your customers</b></p>
<p>It hasn&#8217;t happened yet, but soon a blog might become no more than an RSS feed that is read on another domain, and discussed in small communities of friends, sometimes private, sometimes public, but still fragmented conversation.</p>
<h3>Sharing In Google Reader</h3>
<p>I have probably been the most vocal in my dislike of Google Reader sharing.</p>
<p>Google reader is one of the most effective tools for <a href="http://andybeard.eu/2006/10/google-reader-splogs-linkblogs-blog-readership.html">creating splogs</a><br />
RSS Readers should <a href="http://andybeard.eu/2006/11/google-are-killing-the-future-of-rss.html">provide publishers with a choice as to whether their content can be easily shared</a> further than the original subscriber.<br />
<a href="http://andybeard.eu/2007/09/open-social-web-google-reader.html">Bloglines have discussed and implemented access control, and Facebook even uses it</a></p>
<h3>Fragmented Comments</h3>
<p>I totally understand <a href="http://paulbuchheit.blogspot.com/2008/03/is-fragmentation-bad.html">Paul from Friendfeed</a> in his analogy with films, that he wants to discuss a film with his friends, and that YouTube isn&#8217;t exactly the epitomy of stimulating conversation.</p>
<p>But the intent of a movie or YouTube isn&#8217;t to stimulate dialogue at the venue, otherwise they would improve the venues. In fact YouTube was purposely designed with viral intention, for the content to be syndicated and for conversations to happen elsewhere. With the YouTube API, Google wants to hand off being the publisher (and their legal problems) in return for advertising $.</p>
<p>Many bloggers on the other hand blog to stimulate conversation on their own blogs, to generate page views, and maybe make a little money from advertising or services.</p>
<p><a href="http://internetducttape.com/2008/03/18/the-fragmentation-of-identity-and-discussion/">Engtech @ Internet Duct Tape</a></p>
<blockquote><p>
As a content producer itâ€™s really nice to see discussions happening around the content Iâ€™ve created.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>But at least I know how people are reactingâ€¦ with the explosion of social media / social networking I have no idea what people are saying unless Iâ€™m actively a member of those communities.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>
As a content consumer itâ€™s much more convenient to respond to content on the community where I found it from.
</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>
The fragmentation of discussion might be bad for the content producer, but it makes things so much easier for the content consumer. I know which way this trend is headingâ€¦</p>
<p>(A smart person would build a social network scraper to reimport the comments from there into their blogging engine software â€” if you know of any plugins like that then leave a comment)
</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.scheinschatten.de/">Nico</a> in a recent comment on my post &#8220;<a href="http://andybeard.eu/2008/03/friendfeed-technorati.html#comment-220679">How To Add FriendFeed to Technorati</a>&#8221;</p>
<blockquote><p>
Thanks for that information. I got everything running now.</p>
<p>I hope it gets me some fresh content in form of comments to my blog posts.
</p></blockquote>
<p>A very simple wish, but the chances of it happening are remote, especially for a foreign language blog unless FriendFeed becomes popular in Germany.</p>
<h3>Warning Signals From September</h3>
<p>Whilst the writing was on the wall before hand, especially in hindsight, when news leaked about a <a href="http://blogoscoped.com/archive/2007-09-11-n21.html">potential commenting system in Google Reader</a>, <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/11/google-may-add-comment-feature-on-shared-reader-feeds/">there was a fair amount of controversy</a>.</p>
<p>Whilst Google have since implemented the sharing of items with your gmail contacts automatically in Google Reader, nothing has appeared regarding activity streams and commenting.</p>
<p><b>Isn&#8217;t that odd?</b></p>
<p>The thing is, if Google implement this, there would be public outcry &#8211; it is not just bloggers publishing RSS feeds, but also major news corporations.</p>
<p>How convenient that <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/friendfeed-taking-a-poke-at-the-monster-social-networks/">Friendfeed was launched a few weeks later</a> by a bunch of former Googlers</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think there was any kind of conspiracy, as an example Paul Buchheit had been outside Google for over a year, and other founders were also working outside Google on new projects.</p>
<p>Previous relationships would however potentially make Friendfeed a very comfortable acquisition target after it had matured and the public opinion was appeased.</p>
<h3>Add Comments to RSS or RSS to Comments?</h3>
<p>First off, I expect someone to come out with some kind of Greasemonkey script very soon to work in Friendfeed, so that you can pull in items from the original site without leaving Friendfeed. I am amazed it hasn&#8217;t happened already, as there are already scripts for use with Google Reader.</p>
<p>Then think of Flickr &#8211; <a href="http://twitter.com/marshallk/statuses/774051189">I have already seen this wish</a> from <a href="http://marshallk.com/">Marshall Kirkpatrick</a> on Twitter</p>
<blockquote><p>
wish FriendFeed added some AJAX, hover-over lightbox Flickr photo popu action
</p></blockquote>
<p>You could probably do that in Greasemonkey for the early adopters, but eventually add it to the main Friendfeed interface, and people would never have to visit Flickr to see full content pictures.</p>
<p>Alternatively it would also be easy to integrate Friendfeed comments into Google Reader</p>
<h3>Disqus Too</h3>
<p>FriendFeed are not the only possible solution in town &#8211; <a href="http://www.unionsquareventures.com/2008/03/disqus.html">recently funded Disqus</a> (and a number of others) for instance would make a great replacement for the ailing comment system on Blogger. Blogger commenting stinks.</p>
<p>At the same time why limit Disqus commenting to only blogs that have installed the javascript code? Wouldn&#8217;t it make sense to allow Disqus commenting for any blog or RSS content, whether they ran the code or not? People using Disqus would still see it, and possibly trackbacks could be sent to the blog that there is a dicussion just so the author is aware of it, and encouraged to join and maybe switch commenting.</p>
<p>RSS content could also be pulled into Disqus at a later date, it would enhance conversation to have it all tied together on one site&#8230; like it used to be, even if it is only as an iframe pulled from Google Reader (why show annoying advertising)</p>
<h3>Smart Business&#8230; Maybe</h3>
<p>Fred Wilson actually <a href="http://avc.blogs.com/a_vc/2008/03/thoughts-on-fri.html">wrote a little about Friendfeed as well</a>, I do agree with him on this specific statement</p>
<blockquote><p>
So now, in addition to this blog, my tumblog, and twitter, I have to pay attention to whats&#8217; going on in FriendFeed. So it&#8217;s gone from being an aggregator of attention to a demander of attention. Good for them. That&#8217;s the way to play the game on the web.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Grabbing attention and content is smart business, but what happens when you have to monitor conversation on 20 or 30 different comment aggregating services, not all of which have an open API (of that I am confident at least some will provide)</p>
<h3>Traffic, SEO and Accessibility</h3>
<p>Disqus currently have some problems with this &#8211; it is javascript, a blog owner loses long tail traffic directly to their blog.<br />
It also poses usability problems for people using non-javascript browsers. They don&#8217;t even get to even see that comments exist somewhere &#8211; that is likely a legal issue in lots of Europe.</p>
<p>There are benefits &#8211; serving comments is a database hit, and a comment being updated changes the cache or part of the cache serving the blog post &#8211; comments should really be served as an embed or in an Iframe, with javascript enhancing the content, not serving it.</p>
<p>In general, comment systems are fairly prehistoric, and could actually bring in more traffic. Rather than being extra content to an original article, they could each be treated like a twitter tweet, and then served on a page with its own title, that is also used as anchor text linking to the comment on a permalink page. That would turn a blog post with 50 comments into 51 pages of unique content &#8211; some would be a little weak on content, but others would be substantial.</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t new, it would be just like old threaded forum scripts.</p>
<p>If data was stored with timestamps in XML, then it would be easy to integrate it and possibly cross-pollinate the conversation, but would commenters always want an author to know about their conversation?<br />
Thus you would need various privacy settings and discussion groups.</p>
<h3>The Race To Kill Blogging</h3>
<p>I don&#8217;t think in this scenario blogging would really exist &#8211; you would have original content producers, but there wouldn&#8217;t really be a need for the blog platform. A blog post would purely be the starting point in a distributed conversation thread which would contain other blog posts, or just simple comments &#8211; it is just another node in the conversation.</p>
<p><b>Back to CompuServe, Prodigy, Usenet, FidoNet, CIX and AOL</b></p>
<p>Fragmented discussions are nothing new &#8211; once the fragments are joined back together, it is a bit like a timewarp or things going full circle 20 years.</p>
<p>Actually 20 years ago was so much easier. I was on CIX &#8211; you could use an offline reader and &#8220;blink&#8221; to download your threaded discussion messages &#8211; a much more efficient workflow and very little if any advertising or spam.</p>
<p>Sure you would present the data differently &#8211; in those days my Commodore Amiga with 4MB of memory was a beast, these days that could be taken up by a single webpage. </p>
<p>Do you really want to go &#8220;Back To The Future&#8221;?</p>
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_brick-red" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%253A%252F%252Fandybeard.eu%252F1295%252Fthe-death-of-blogging.html%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22small%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Why%20Have%20Blogs%20At%20All%3F%20-%20The%20Race%20To%20Kill%20Blogging%22%20%7D);"></div>


	Tags: <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/aol" title="aol" rel="tag">aol</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/blogging" title="blogging" rel="tag">blogging</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/blogs" title="blogs" rel="tag">blogs</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/cix" title="cix" rel="tag">cix</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/comments" title="comments" rel="tag">comments</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/compuserve" title="compuserve" rel="tag">compuserve</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/disqus" title="disqus" rel="tag">disqus</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/fidonet" title="fidonet" rel="tag">fidonet</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/friendfeed" title="friendfeed" rel="tag">friendfeed</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/greasemonkey" title="greasemonkey" rel="tag">greasemonkey</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/prodigy" title="prodigy" rel="tag">prodigy</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/rss" title="rss" rel="tag">rss</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/usenet" title="usenet" rel="tag">usenet</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://andybeard.eu/1295/the-death-of-blogging.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blogcatalog SezWho Partnership &#8211; Passes MyBlogLog Traffic</title>
		<link>http://andybeard.eu/1178/blogcatalog-sezwho.html</link>
		<comments>http://andybeard.eu/1178/blogcatalog-sezwho.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 14:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blogging tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogcatalog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogcatalog api]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disqus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mybloglog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mybloglog API]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sezwho]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andybeard.eu/2008/01/blogcatalog-sezwho.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img align="right" src='http://cdn5.andybeard.name/wp-content/uploads/blogcatalog-sezwho.png' alt='Blogcatalog SezWho' />For the last few weeks Blogcatalog have been driving full steam with new features, and today announce a partnership with SezWho, the comment and reputation ranking platform.

I have been slacking a little over the last month on the updates, so time to play catch up.

First of all some big news, Blogcatalog has now surpassed MyBlogLog in traffic levels, if you believe <a href="http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details/blogcatalog.com?q=">Alexa data</a>. They are in exactly the same niche, and share plenty of users, so whilst I don't trust Alexa data extensively, this is a significant achievement considering it wasn't long ago when people had trouble differentiating the two services.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><img align="right" src='http://cdn5.andybeard.name/wp-content/uploads/blogcatalog-sezwho.png' alt='Blogcatalog SezWho' />For the last few weeks Blogcatalog have been driving full steam with new features, and today announce a partnership with SezWho, the comment and reputation ranking platform.</p>
<p>I have been slacking a little over the last month on the updates, so time to play catch up.</p>
<p>First of all some big news, Blogcatalog has now surpassed MyBlogLog in traffic levels, if you believe <a href="http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details/blogcatalog.com?q=">Alexa data</a>. They are in exactly the same niche, and share plenty of users, so whilst I don&#8217;t trust Alexa data extensively, this is a significant achievement considering it wasn&#8217;t long ago <a href="http://andybeard.eu/2007/07/mybloglog-vs-blogcatalog-differentiation.html">when people had trouble differentiating the two services</a>.</p>
<p><img src='http://cdn5.andybeard.name/wp-content/uploads/blogcatalog-alexa-3-year.png' alt='Blogcatalog Alexa 3 year' /></p>
<p>If you switch to a 7 day view, you will see that Blogcatalog overtook MyBlogLog 24th January.</p>
<p><img src='http://cdn5.andybeard.name/wp-content/uploads/blogcatalog-alexa-1-month.png' alt='Blogcatalog passes MyBlogLog on Alexa 30 day' /></p>
<p>The observant will also note when looking at a 3 year chart that MyBlogLog had much more explosive growth over a short 3 month period, were purchased by Yahoo, and since that time has been a little bit in decline which is a shame because I still love MyBlogLog, and if I have a choice between MyBlogLog and Google Analytics for stats checking, I am more likely to have a glance in MyBlogLog than Google Analytics.</p>
<p>BlogCatalog has had a much more gradual growth, working to differentiate themselves by introducing lively discussion forums and member groups, and bringing bloggers together to <a href="http://unite.blogcatalog.com/">support good causes with Bloggers Unite</a>.<br />
The growth has been viral, &#8220;grass roots&#8221; growth, with from memory one mention on Mashable, one mention on Marketing Pilgrim, and very little if any coverage on large technology blogs. Blogcatalog would be a great example of <a href="http://blog.guykawasaki.com/2008/01/forget-the-a-li.html">what Guy Kawasaki was talking about yesterday</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>
Forget A-list bloggers. Lousy reviews by them cannot tank your product. Great reviews cannot make it successful. Focus on big numbersâ€”any Technorati 1,000,000 blogger can be a channel to reach people. If enough people like your product, the A-list bloggers will have to write about you.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Some key recent enhancements (<b>click through to see working examples on some of these widgets</b>)</p>
<h3>Blogcatalog Discussions &#038; Groups</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.blogcatalog.com/discuss">Discussion Forums</a> and <a href="http://www.blogcatalog.com/groups">Groups</a></p>
<p>There are frequent enhancements to the features in the various discussion areas, the latest one being a new widget for the discussion groups you have joined &#8211; other features include practical enhancements to the discussion features, in many cases making them more useful than Facebook, where it is very hard to track discussion in the groups you join.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.blogcatalog.com/w/group.php?id=u_51738&amp;width=180&amp;rows=5&amp;htext=My%20Groups&amp;bg=gr"></script></p>
<h3>BlogRank Buttons (just released)</h3>
<p>This was announced just <a href="http://www.blogcatalog.com/discuss/entry/new-blogcatalog-blogrank-badge">a few hours ago</a><br />
<a href="http://www.blogcatalog.com/in/4261199" title="Internet Blogs - Blog Catalog Blog Directory"><img src="http://cdn5.andybeard.name/wp-content/uploads/4261199.gif" alt="My BlogCatalog BlogRank"></a></p>
<p>BlogCatalog ratings are based upon various metrics including votes using a widget on your site, voting on the site, visits from Blogcatalog to your blog, and overall Blogcatalog activity in various forms.</p>
<h3>Communities Widget</h3>
<p>This is a way to display your profile on other social media sites <a href="http://www.blogcatalog.com/discuss/entry/its-a-new-widget">introduced in December</a>. Quite simple, and useful if you don&#8217;t want to give juice to the sites for reputation management.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.blogcatalog.com/w/services.php?id=51738&amp;width=180&amp;bgcolor=FFFFFF&amp;bcolor=FFFFFF&amp;lcolor=333333&amp;hcolor=FFFFFF&amp;htext=My%20Communities&amp;name=0&amp;brand=1&amp;heading=1"></script></p>
<p>On this one I am not sure who got there first, as <a href="http://mybloglogb.typepad.com/my_weblog/2007/12/the-mybloglog-a.html">MyBlogLog also launched a similar widget in December</a></p>
<p>There actually seems to be some bugs in the code generated, or maybe it is just my laggy connection, but I couldn&#8217;t seem to get a version that displayed both the names of a service, and icons next to them.</p>
<h3>BlogCatalog API</h3>
<p>I am not that great a programmer but I have managed to play around with the <a href="http://www.blogcatalog.com/api/">Blogcatalog API</a> and create some simple applications (still to be released) by combining data from Blogcatalog with data from other APIs. Blogcatalog has had their API available for some time.</p>
<p>MyBlogLog should have had their API launched months ago by my reckoning, and it <a href="http://developer.yahoo.com/mybloglog/">finally entered beta a week ago</a>. It seems like it <a href="http://raven-seo-tools.com/blog/98/how-to-extend-your-blog-and-promote-your-members-with-the-mybloglog-api">might have more features</a> than the current Blogcatalog API, but once you have opened up, opening up a little more isn&#8217;t too difficult.<br />
With wider adoption (the tech bloggers have been wooed by MBL in the past) the new MBL API is being greeted as <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/myblog_api.php">the possible saviour of Yahoo</a>.<br />
Sure, it is possible MyBlogLog have more data stored, I am not sure what data Blogcatalog collect, have a wider audience, and MyBlogLog have the <a href="http://kentbrewster.com/first-steps-with-the-mybloglog-api/">&#8220;social starfish&#8221; available via API</a>, but it isn&#8217;t much more work for Blogcatalog to allow access to that data.<br />
MyBlogLog have however been working on infrastructure heavily for the last&#8230; 12 months &#8211; I would hope their API is now ready for some heavy usage.</p>
<p>I would love to have seen some cool apps made with the Blogcatalog API by now</p>
<h3>Support For WordPress.com, Myspace, or Yahoo! 360 Blog?</h3>
<p>This is something that MyBlogLog have had for some time, <a href="http://www.blogcatalog.com/group/blogcatalog/discuss/entry/new-blogcatalog-widget-for-wordpress-myspace-and-yahoo-360-blogs">Blogcatalog announced support for WordPress.com, Myspace and Yahoo! 360 yesterday</a>.</p>

<div class="bcrrw">
<h2><span>Recent Readers</span></h2>
<p><a href="http://www.blogcatalog.com/rr/4261199_0.html"><img src="http://cdn5.andybeard.name/wp-content/uploads/4261199_0.gif" alt="View My Profile" title="View My Profile"></a><br />
<a href="http://www.blogcatalog.com/rr/4261199_1.html"><img src="http://cdn5.andybeard.name/wp-content/uploads/4261199_1.gif" alt="View My Profile" title="View My Profile"></a><br />
<a href="http://www.blogcatalog.com/rr/4261199_2.html"><img src="http://cdn5.andybeard.name/wp-content/uploads/4261199_2.gif" alt="View My Profile" title="View My Profile"></a><br />
<a href="http://www.blogcatalog.com/rr/4261199_3.html"><img src="http://cdn5.andybeard.name/wp-content/uploads/4261199_3.gif" alt="View My Profile" title="View My Profile"></a><br />
<a href="http://www.blogcatalog.com/rr/4261199_4.html"><img src="http://cdn5.andybeard.name/wp-content/uploads/4261199_4.gif" alt="View My Profile" title="View My Profile"></a></p>
<div><a href="http://www.blogcatalog.com/in/4261199"><span>Powered by BlogCatalog</span></a></div>
</div>
<p>Who knows, maybe you can even see my recent visitors in a feed reader, in fact that would be an interesting addition.</p>
<h3>Tagging &#038; Reading</h3>
<p>Quite a few months ago I wrote about Blogcatalog parsing tags from your feed items and then listing your content on varous tag pages, just like Technorati. At the time they only offered support for a few blogs, using a specific format for tags and categories. I noticed a couple of months ago that they now have my blog being picked up and fed into tag feeds</p>
<p>In addition on your profile pages it is now possible to read the feeds of the blogs you have added to your neighborhood</p>
<p>Ok now for the big one&#8230;</p>
<h3>Blogcatalog SezWho Partnership</h3>
<p>Blogcatalog today have just announced a partnership with SezWho, who provide special plugins to integrate with Plugin Systems on various blogging and discussion forums.<br />
The good things from my perspective:-</p>
<ul>
<li>SezWho doesn&#8217;t require any form of browser plugin</li>
<li>This doesn&#8217;t replace the existing comment system, thus a blog owner retains the content on their site, and if they choose, can remain dofollow. That isn&#8217;t true of other replacement comment systems with similar features.</li>
<li>No browser plugin is required &#8211; I often had problems using various browser based comment tracking with incompatibilities, and I also had problems with their plugins, though I must admit I haven&#8217;t retried with cocomment recently, maybe that situation has improved. Comment tracking that required me to click a button was always awkward, and subscribing to RSS feeds for comments on individual posts just became a chore &#8211; we will see how this works in the long run</li>
<li>Comment ratings &#8211; this could be likened to the thumbs up / thumbs down on SEOmoz where you gain points, but this is a distributed rating system that means you gain in reputation for leaving high quality comments across multiple blogs &#8211; I am not sure whether this gets gamed heavily, but Ihope that it will encourage better commenting, especially on dofollow blogs.</li>
<p><b>Warning:- I may be more inclined to just delete a URL from a spam comment rather than deleting them totally, so that other readers can also vote your comment down</b><br />
<small>yes, sometimes there is a little evil in me</small>
</ul>
<p>Negative points?</p>
<ul>
<li>Only support for WordPress self-hosted and Moveable Type &#8211; in many ways I would look on this as a plus, as it might encourage more people onto their own hosting, though I hope they can come up with a solution for my many blogging friends on Typepad.</li>
<li>Installation is a little complicated for a novice, though there is a WordPress widget (regular readers know I don&#8217;t like WordPress Widgets though for SEO reasons)</li>
</ul>
<p>I should also point out that as I am writing this I haven&#8217;t tested the integration on this blog with the threaded comments, but I don&#8217;t expect there to a problem, and by the time many people read this I will have everything up and running.</p>
<h3>Setting Up SezWho</h3>
<p>Log into Blogcatalog, go to your account and manage your blog</p>
<p>You will see just after the feed management section a big button to create an account on SezWho. |Click it, wait a moment or 2, and you will be issued an API key, and you will be given a link to click to download special versions of the SezWho plugins.</p>
<p><img src='http://cdn5.andybeard.name/wp-content/uploads/grab-sezwho-plugin.png' alt='Special Blogcatalog SezWho Plugins' /></p>
<h3>Goodbye MyAvatars</h3>
<p>I have been using the WordPress plugin MyAvatars for over a year now, but it is time for it to be retired.</p>
<p>MyAvatars uses images from MyBlogLog, and unfortunately on popular content it is starting to cause me problems on page loading times. This isn&#8217;t something that was a major problem for me before, because I had a very fast connection, but it has started to cause me real problems, maybe because MyBlogLog switched over to the Yahoo image platform, or maybe it is a problem that always existed.<br />
<img src='http://cdn5.andybeard.name/wp-content/uploads/mybloglog-image-sizes.png' alt='MyBlogLog Avatar Image Size' /></p>
<p>This doesn&#8217;t prevent people viewing my content quickly, because avatars and widgets are generally loaded in parallel, but on a slow connection it can start to hurt a little.<br />
When your total page sizes can reach over 1MB, and most of that is avatars on comments, it is time to reconsider.</p>
<p>One caveat, I am not sure if the SEZWho Blogcatalog plugin will add avatars to trackbacks, I will have to take a look.</p>
<h3>Benefits</h3>
<p>Big immediate benefit for Blogcatalog is press coverage, as SezWho are in California. I think it is a good match as both are heavily aimed at promoting discussion between bloggers, both on blogs and off them.</p>
<p>I am also not a fan of applications that try to do too much &#8211; SezWho seems to do just enough to be worthwhile whilst leaving me in control of content left on my blog, and commenter ratings will certainly help in making the decision on whether a commenter is generally well behaved. I don&#8217;t mind short jokey comments or great post Andy if it is from someone legitimate, it is when someone comes in as a first time commenter, you rarely know if they are genuine.</p>
<h3>About Blogcatalog &#038; SezWho</h3>
<p>My blog has in the last 9 months grown into quite an in depth resource on all things &#8220;<a href="http://www.blogcatalog.com">Blogcatalog</a>&#8220;. I first started writing about them when they <a href="http://andybeard.eu/2007/04/blogcatalog-slam-dunks-mybloglog.html">relaunched around April 2007</a> with an initial investment of $40000 to purchase the existing property.<br />
Full coverage of Blogcatalog can be found by browsing my <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/blogcatalog">Blogcatalog tag</a>.</p>
<p>Primary competitor for Blogcatalog is <a href="http://www.mybloglog.com">Mybloglog</a></p>
<p>SezWho when they received $1M investment from KPG Ventures back in October 2007 were given <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/31/big-bucks-for-better-comments-sezwho-raises-1-million/">quite a luke warm reception on Techcrunch.</a></p>
<p>Competitors to <a href="http://www.sezwho.com">SezWho</a> include <a href="http://www.disqus.com/">Disqus</a>, <a href="http://intensedebate.com/">Intense Debate</a> and <a href="http://www.cocomment.com/">coComment</a></p>
<p><small>Specific Disclosure &#8211; I do some consulting with Blogcatalog on a very much low key, part time basis, though I also give coverage to their competitors and try to remain impartial &#8211; I have given MyBlogLog extensive coverage as well, most recently in a joint interview with Ian Kennedy on <a href="http://collective-thoughts.com/2007/12/18/mybloglog-interview/">Collective Thoughts</a></small></p>
<p>Further coverage no doubt on the <a href="http://blog.blogcatalog.com/">Blogcatalog blog</a> though the press release isn&#8217;t posted yet.</p>
<h3>Update</h3>
<p>I had planned to have the widget code working within a couple of minutes of posting, but it seems not to fully like my theme or maybe some other incompatibility.<br />
This is what it is meant to look like.</p>
<p><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2143/2219304703_07d464f36b.jpg?v=0" alt="SezWho Blogcatalog" /></p>
<h3>Update 2</h3>
<p>There is now coverage on <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/30/sezwho-partners-with-blogcatalog-for-distribution-of-comment-reputation-system/">Techcrunch</a>, <a href="http://mashable.com/2008/01/30/blogcatalog-sezwho/">Mashable</a> <a href="http://rexduffdixon.com/?p=3361">Rex Dixon</a> <a href="http://tdrapeau.com/2008/01/30/blogcatalog-sezwho/">Tom Drapeau (AOL / Propeller), <a href="http://blogstring.com/2008/01/31/blogcatalog-adds-sezwhos-comment-ranking-platform/">Blogstring</a></a>  and Jitendra is compiling a list of <a href="http://www.sezwho.com/blog/?p=195">blog mentions  on the SezWho blog</a>.</p>
<p>I am fascinated what it will take to finally get some mention of Blogcatalog on<a href="http://www.techmeme.com/"> Techmeme</a> and possibly some wider exposure.</p>
<div class="topsy_widget_data topsy_theme_brick-red" style="float: right;margin-left: 0.75em; background: url(data:,%7B%20%22url%22%3A%20%22http%253A%252F%252Fandybeard.eu%252F1178%252Fblogcatalog-sezwho.html%22%2C%20%22shorturl%22%3A%20%22http%3A%2F%2Fbit.ly%2FcLpiyX%22%2C%20%22style%22%3A%20%22small%22%2C%20%22title%22%3A%20%22Blogcatalog%20SezWho%20Partnership%20-%20Passes%20MyBlogLog%20Traffic%22%20%7D);"></div>


	Tags: <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/blogcatalog" title="Blogcatalog" rel="tag">Blogcatalog</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/blogcatalog-api" title="blogcatalog api" rel="tag">blogcatalog api</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/disqus" title="disqus" rel="tag">disqus</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/mybloglog" title="mybloglog" rel="tag">mybloglog</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/mybloglog-api" title="Mybloglog API" rel="tag">Mybloglog API</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/sezwho" title="sezwho" rel="tag">sezwho</a>, <a href="http://andybeard.eu/tag/wordpress" title="wordpress" rel="tag">wordpress</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://andybeard.eu/1178/blogcatalog-sezwho.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 31/82 queries in 0.019 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 1252/1391 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn5.andybeard.name

Served from: andybeard.eu @ 2012-02-13 01:23:31 -->
