{"id":311,"date":"2007-05-22T18:33:34","date_gmt":"2007-05-22T18:33:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/andybeard.eu\/?p=311"},"modified":"2018-01-29T00:48:51","modified_gmt":"2018-01-29T00:48:51","slug":"77-reasons-why-google-buying-feedburner-is-a-match-made-in-heaven-hell","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/andybeard.eu\/2007\/05\/77-reasons-why-google-buying-feedburner-is-a-match-made-in-heaven-hell.html","title":{"rendered":"7+7 Reasons Why Google Buying FeedBurner is a Match Made in Heaven & Hell"},"content":{"rendered":"

Rumours have been surfacing for the last few days that Google might be buying FeedBurner for\u00a0around $100M.<\/p>\n

Listed below you will find 7 reasons Google and Feedburner are a perfect match, and 7 equally compelling reasons we should be concerned.<\/b><\/p>\n

Match Made In Heaven?<\/h2>\n

There are some very positive reasons that this is an ideal match and I am going to concentrate on those first:-<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Existing Subscriber Statistics<\/b>\u00a0\u2013 Google mentioned that subscriber statistics are part of their calculations for relevance for\u00a0Google Blog Search<\/a>\u00a0in recently released patent details. Whilst I have determined it is\u00a0not currently a major ranking factor for blog search<\/a>\u00a0, Google are moving down a path of providing personal search results and are continually looking to\u00a0improve Blog Search.<\/a><\/li>\n
  2. Integrate FeedBurner With Blogger<\/b>\u00a0\u2013 Google look to provide useful services for their existing portfolio of products, and Blogger provides them with lots of advertising space. Many of Google\u2019s competitors offer some kind of feed statistics (WordPress.com), and Google need to do the same.<\/li>\n
  3. Integrate FeedBurner with Google Analytics<\/b>\u00a0\u2013 I have seen this discussed slightly, but no one hit the nail on the head. Currently it is impossible to track conversions into an RSS subscriber in the same way you can with email subscriptions. This is a major stumbling block for the future of RSS within marketing.<\/li>\n
  4. Intellectual Property<\/b>\u00a0\u2013 lots of the things that Feedburner do such as their advertising system, feedflares, redirects for RSS feeds, and maybe even aspects of their tracking technology could well have a patent pending, though whatever applications they may have made they are keeping the lid on.<\/li>\n
  5. 422,717 publishers<\/b>\u00a0\u2013 It is not a huge number, and is very easy to increase with an integration with Blogger. It is certainly many more than any current direct competitor. People are waving around that $100M is a good price based upon 10x earnings, and 10x the VC investment of around $10M in Feedburner. The most important statistic is that probably 99% of feed publishers currently don\u2019t automatically qualify for Feedburner\u2019s advertiser program. Certainly with 1000 subscribers the \u201cmonetize\u201d tab is still closed for me.<\/li>\n
  6. Economy of Scale (Publishers)<\/b>\u00a0\u2013 it is hard to provide tracking for advertisers over 1000s of blogs, and also to handle the payment infrastructure for smaller publishers. That is probably one of the primary reasons FeedBurner up until now has only had monetization options for popular blogs, or \u201cnetwork feeds\u201d.<\/li>\n
  7. Economy of Scale (Advertisers)<\/b>\u00a0\u2013 Google has a massive amount of advertising inventory, it is just a question of adding the ability to advertise on the blog content network, especially with their CPA offers which would be ideal for feeds<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Match Made In Hell?<\/h2>\n

    In many ways I am a Google fan, I use their search primarily, I use Adwords, Adsense, have their toolbar installed, couldn\u2019t live without Gmail, and I am trying my best to not get sucked into 200 feeds in Google Reader.<\/p>\n

    I am also a FeedBurner Fan, I have a paid subscription to their \u201cTotal Stats\u201d, and have developed a few simple Feedflares.<\/p>\n

    Unfortunately I am not overly enthusiastic about Google buying FeedBurner for a number of very serious reasons.<\/p>\n

      \n
    1. Slow Development<\/b>\u00a0\u2013 I don\u2019t expect faster development of features above integration with Google\u2019s existing services. For me that is worrying especially as someone who publishes commercial content.<\/li>\n
    2. Legal Compliance<\/b>\u00a0\u2013 I have been\u00a0waiting for 5 months\u00a0for email subscriptions that fully comply with CAN-SPAM and SI 3429 of 2006.
      \nThis is something that is possible with Feedblitz and Zookoda, but based on my current research, FeedBurner has the edge on delivery rates. What is needed is an interface to customize emails. Would we really see new features faster once aquired?<\/li>\n
    3. Ability to add Copyright information<\/b>\u00a0\u2013 the only option currently is a\u00a0custom feed flare\u00a0, but that is a graphic easily stripped by people abusing your content. Then again most of the Blogospere seemed to think a few months ago that\u00a0no one has a right to copyright their feeds<\/a>\u00a0, and that once you publish content by RSS, you have no claim over it.<\/li>\n
    4. Bugs in the API<\/b>\u00a0\u2013 these\u00a0haven\u2019t been fixed for months\u00a0, such as the ability to have a \u201cclean\u201d link within a feedflare unit.<\/li>\n
    5. Squashing Competition<\/b>\u00a0\u2013 FeedBurner haven\u2019t got a huge amount of direct competiton, but certainly\u00a0Feedvertising\u00a0is competition for the monetization of feeds, so is\u00a0Blogkits<\/a>\u00a0, and\u00a0Zookoda<\/a>\u00a0owned by\u00a0Pay Per Post<\/a>\u00a0will likely offer advertising for email subscribers.Whilst both Feedburner and Feedvertising seem to think that Techcrunch is displaying Ads from their network, it seems to me\u00a0Techcrunch are using Feedvertising to primarily display links to their own sites. See here that Techcrunch is listed under\u00a0blogs on Feedburner.<\/li>\n
    6. Poor Support<\/b>\u00a0\u2013 Google\u2019s support unfortunately isn\u2019t the greatest, especially when they suggest responding in \u201cGoogle Groups\u201d from their blog.
      \nHere are 2 very specific examples<\/p>\n